User talk:Harleytarantina

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joker (comics). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. The edit(s) are as follows: [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked 1 month for edit-warring and sock puppetry. (blocked by MuZemike 02:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

January 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:PhilKnight, you will be blocked from editing. CardinalDan (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: "The Vandalism"

"Revenge" is not allowed on Wikipedia.  IShadowed  ✰  23:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Colombiano21

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policywill be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CardinalDan (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Barek has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Mikeo (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Joker (comics). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please provide a source. IMDb doesn't agree with this statement. Favonian (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked January 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. tedder (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

I've blocked you for rapidly reverting pages in an apparent dispute with another user. Please communicate your intentions through edit summaries and talk pages- I'd suggest reading WP:CIVIL carefully. tedder (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Admiraljames-norrington.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Admiraljames-norrington.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ryan4314 (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Notice of WP:ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Disruptive edits going against community consensus. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page User:Fastily. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. Jusdafax 16:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for You have been warned before about blanking user pages. I note that you have said that you do this for revenge. [14]. Blanking and redirecting user pages is disruptive at the very least.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Dougweller (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 15:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:GGgunbarrel4.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GGgunbarrel4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblema M-19.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblema M-19.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)