User talk:Harleyrules170

Welcome!

Hello, Harleyrules170, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Andvd (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Tourist Area articles

Hi! I noticed you have started creating some articles named after a place followed by "tourist area". I am a little confused as to what these articles are supposed to be about. Please review the links above in the welcome message posted by Andvd. ./zro (⠠⠵) 06:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Posting of copyrighted material

Many of your new "Tourist Area" articles are in the process of being tagged for deletion as they are violating copyrights. Plesae post articles in your own words.
In addition, please consider improving articles on those areas that already exist, rather than creating a new article with "Tourist Area" added to the name. The post by Andvd above has good information in it.
Turgan ^Talk 06:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Grampians Tourist Area

A tag has been placed on Grampians Tourist Area requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ./zro (⠠⠵) 06:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Daylesford & Macedon Ranges Tourist Area

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Daylesford & Macedon Ranges Tourist Area, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Daylesford & Macedon Ranges Tourist Area is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Daylesford & Macedon Ranges Tourist Area, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Anglesea, Victoria. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nancy ^talk 06:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Murrumburrah Railway Station, New South Wales

A tag has been placed on Murrumburrah Railway Station, New South Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nancy ^talk 09:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of McDougalls Siding, Victoria

A tag has been placed on McDougalls Siding, Victoria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ./zro (⠠⠵) 21:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to A/UX has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. sinneed (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to A priori and a posteriori. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abalone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geronimo20 (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your going to get into trouble if you continue to remove content from articles, Its good that you want to add information, but many of your edits are removing already present text and formating. Please use the welcome links up above, to learn more about how wikipedia works. 07:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Abadan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Specifically - text copied from www.iraniannet.net/abadan.html Nancy ^talk 07:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Abacus. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nancy ^talk 07:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Sani Abacha. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Specifically - the text you copied from Encarta. Nancy ^talk 07:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Aba, Nigeria. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Another cut and paste from Encarta Nancy ^talk 07:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for copyright violation

You have been blocked from editing for a short period due to your persistent and extensive introduction of copyrighted material to Wikipedia. You have been warned about this several times in the past yet in the 90 minutes from 03:59 UTC to 05:28 UTC this morning you added significant text to approaching two dozen articles which was simply cut and pasted from various web souces including Microsoft's Encarta Encyclopaedia. You also deleted formatted non-copyvio content from many of the articles at the same time.

Whilst you are blocked please take the opportunity to read Wikipedia's copyright policy and to understand that any text you add here must be in your own words. If you continue to violate copyrights once your block is lifted I shall have no hesitation in blocking you permanently. Nancy ^talk 07:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tyntynder, Victoria

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Tyntynder, Victoria are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! Turgan ^Talk 00:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]