User talk:Harics456

Welcome!

Hello, Harics456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 23:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Qwyrxian. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kushwaha without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC) kushwaha doesnt fall in sudhra varna. That my question. you source is only based on william pinch book. thats nt right. if you would have been from india ,you should know that kushwaha never fall in that category .[reply]

May 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Kushwaha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC) if you dont know than dont write misleading stuffs about kushwaha. Kushwaha doesnt fall in sudhra varna. see any of india official cast divide system.kushwaha never fall in sudhra varna. If you can delete that line,that will be fine.Pls.[reply]

June 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kushwaha. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kushwaha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 17:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 17:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

If you agree to stop these edits until you get agreement on the talk page, use the unblock template to ask to be unblocked. Please note that if you continue to edit in this way after your block expires you will probably get blocked again. Dougweller (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You guys are biased .--Harics456 (talk) 17:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will come back again tomorrow. be ready to block me again--Harics456 (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no one can edit the article for 3 days. Use that to get agreement. If you can't, and continue to edit war, the block will be reimposed. Dougweller (talk) 18:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kushwaha, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Hold on sir , I am providing the reilable source but you need to justify it. I dont trust sitush talk. http://books.google.com/books?id=num2I4NFGqIC&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=kushwaha+as+agricultural+caste&source=bl&ots=RbDJiP1vn-&sig=0q5PXMIR2U-OdCfKoETdjdD8EGo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ha7IUfKZBI-o9gTApIDQAQ&ved=0CC8Q6AEwATgo#v=onepage&q=kushwaha&f=false see this link. There no way the kuswaha comes under sudhra caste[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kushwaha with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ducknish (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am providing the reliable source but no one is trying to change it. http://books.google.com/books?id=num2I4NFGqIC&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=kushwaha+as+agricultural+caste&source=bl&ots=RbDJiP1vn-&sig=0q5PXMIR2U-OdCfKoETdjdD8EGo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ha7IUfKZBI-o9gTApIDQAQ&ved=0CC8Q6AEwATgo#v=onepage&q=kushwaha&f=false--Harics456 (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harics, I replied to your most recent evidence here. Since you posted the same stuff in three different sections, within minutes of each other, I reduced it to one section. It becomes incredibly confusing for everyone if you repeat info across various discussion threads. - Sitush (talk) 21:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Week for Personal Attack, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kushwaha&diff=prev&oldid=561422901. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

I should have extended your block for using your IP address to edit while you were blocked. Now that you are no longer blocked, please try to edit logged in instead of as an IP. Dougweller (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]