User talk:Hariboneagle927/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with Hariboneagle927. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - ... (up to 100)

About 2015 ASEAN Para Games

I'm here to informed you that according to the official website that athletics is included as the sport of that tournament. Finally, bowling and ten-pin bowling are actually the same sport event.--Hongqilim (talk) 12:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines football

Hello Hariboneagle. There some issues with your recent edits for the history section for Philippines national football team which I will go through one by one.

The first sentence in section 1950s-1990s. In the 1950s the Philippines hosted high-level international friendlies, This is issue with POV. What international friendlies are 'high level'? Are they really 'high level'?

In 1956, Cebu City-based businessman involved in the shipping industry, William Chiongban offered the national team to fund a month-long training camp in Spain for them if they make a decent finish in a friendly against Swedish side, AIK Fotboll. This is factual issue. AIK never went to Philippines in 1956 and they never played against Philippines national team. They went in 1954 and only played against selection teams. [1]

There is issues with context for almost all the second paragraph of section 1950s-1990s. OK, so there were several key players who stop playing for natioanl team after 1958. This would be a bit normal because national team is not that active during this time and ther was little money for football players. Now what does 60-40 rule for clubs have to do with national team?

Although not for Philippines national team, but for Norman Fegidero. There is factual issues. He played for national team from 1989 to 2001 and has 70 appearances. How? If you count all official matches of Philippiens from 1989 to 2001, it is less than 60. So how can Fegidero have 70 appearances? Source is wrong. This is problem with modern sources in Philippine football regarding historical information. Just like the issue with AIK as I already say above, either memory is lacking or research is lacking, perhaps no research at all and now you have factual issues. AndaleCaballo (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the concern. Let me give some comments.

To address the POV issues let's reword the statement and just state that the Philippines hosted friendlies against international sides.

The supposed friendly against AIK should be omitted for now unless other sources prove that such friendly happened. Quick view from [http://www.aik.se/fotboll/statistik/matches.php?id=3446 AIK's Statistics page supports that no such friendly in 1958 occurred. Maybe the one of the two Manila selection team was composed of mostly national players many of them based in Manila but that would be Original Research.

According to the source the national team drew talents from local football leagues supported by the Chinese-Filipino community. Whe the 60-40 provisions were exposed the Chinese-Filipino community backed off from the supporting the leagues, many of them becoming defunct.

I realize that there such caps may include friendlies against club sides and selections. Local media seems to label any friendly against foreign sides as official international friendlies. Again let's omit this claim that Fegidero has about 70 caps.

I am responsible for the edits discussed, but imho it would be better if simillar discussions regarding the Philippines national football team is discussed at its talk page to encourage other users to add their own input. Thanks anyway.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The national team that Chongbian sent to Spain was apparently a "national students team". He also sent his team William Lines to Manila for friendlies although no date were mentioned.[2][3]--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. For second paragraph in 1950s-1990s section, there is still issues with context as I say before. Players already quit playing for national team after 1958, but the way the paragraph is written, it is implying that the 60-40 rule is the root cause of these players to quit national team. But 60-40 rule was only implemented after 1966. So there is something wrong there. For coaches section, there is too much information and detail. It is almost like history section. The last paragraph alone is not necessary. Pros for this section should only be an overview of the coaches. AndaleCaballo (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I revise the paragraph to state that financial difficulties for playing for the national team is the reason for players resigning for the national team. The 60-40 rule resulted to a later setback in Philippine football. Do you have any suggestion on how can I summarized the coach section? Perhaps, I should create a separate article for the head coaches similar to that of other national teams. The implication of Dooley's new system is not yet clear. The addition of the last paragraph may be too soon.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to create separate page for coaches especially since list is not even complete. Pros for this section should be like page for Belgium national team. Something like that. It should not be like history section and things like coach used some young players isn't even necessary. AndaleCaballo (talk) 22:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any feedback? AndaleCaballo (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the input.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) flag

Hello Hariboneagle927, thanks for the suggestion. I have fix the sword but I'm still confused here after seeing those images. Which one is the correct position for the crescent and moon? Is it like on the first and fourth images, or the third one (which is been currently used on the vector). Beside that, I'm also have placed a temporary shahada font which I get from the commons category. I tried to find any shahada caligraphy that resembling the font the MILF using for but still can't find any. Perhaps if you have one, feel free to edit it. :) ~ Muffin Wizard^;) 02:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I encountered the same problem with the Moro National Liberation Front flag. It seems that there is no standardized specification for the MILF flag for things such as the font, exact visual appearance of the sword. The current shahada you added is better than previous one.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Peace wall.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Peace wall.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peace wall.jpg

Hi Hariboneagle927. Regarding File:Peace wall.jpg, I have removed the deletion tag, but, and this is very important, please add a free license tag (such as {{PD-self}} or {{cc-zero}} for your rights as the photographer. Honestly, I don't know what the right answer is, since strictly speaking, you probably cannot grant a license to a derivative of someone else's work, so if you prefer, you could add a statement like "I irrevocably give up my rights as the photographer, allowing any entityt to use it for any purpose inasmuch as it is in my power to grant." The issue is that there are two sets of rights (potentially) - the rights of the creator of the mural and your rights as photographer. So we just need both to be covered. --B (talk) 00:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the file Flag_of_the_Autonomous_Region_in_Muslim_Mindanao.svg

Please help me! I am a beginner in writing articles for Wikipedia and I want to use yours file:Flag_of_the_Autonomous_Region_in_Muslim_Mindanao.svg in the articles Liste des principaux dirigeants locaux, Liste des chefs de l'exécutif par État en 2015 and in the years to come after 2015 and Lista conducătorilor de stat în anul 2015 and in the years to come after 2015, in order to in order to illustrate with their own flag Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao What can I do? Bogdan Uleia (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is currently uploaded under fair use. The flag is made in 1991. While technically exempt from copyright as a work of the government, contradicting restrictions (provisions on commercial use) which may or may not be non copyright restrictions as per discussion here covers works made on 1972 onwards. You may at least upload the image at the French Wikipedia under fair use to be able to use the image.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Cagayan.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Cagayan.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2014 Palarong Pambansa Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2014 Palarong Pambansa Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hi, Hariboneagle927, I'm Chương! Stop, I talk to you did not creating sub-articles for Softball at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games. Thank you! Boyconga278 (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I might have missed it. Maybe you have only talked to the other users. But still no one can usually stop other users to create articles as long as it meets Wikipedia guidelines such as notability. So give me a good a reason why should I not create such articles. You may edit the articles I created because it belongs to the Wikipedia community, not me. Thanks.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]