User talk:Hardhrol

Kindly update Yaduvanshi Rajputs Wikipedia page

Chudasama , Jadeja , Bhati all are Yaduvanshi rajputs that should be mentioned on Yaduvanshi Rajput Wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:8303:F812:0:0:23E:A1 (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your recent edits have been reverted because they disrupted the display of the pages. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hardhrol/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Hardhrol/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hardhrol! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pokhara Rhinos moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pokhara Rhinos, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 17:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kathmandu Kings XI moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kathmandu Kings XI, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 17:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kathmandu Kings XI

Hello, Hardhrol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kathmandu Kings XI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 18:36, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jadaun, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HinduKshatrana is contrary spamming on a race, religion or dynasty related articles, please do somthing. --hardhrol 07:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chudasama dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Ashok Talk 12:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Targetting HinduKshatrana

Stop targetting user HinduKshatrana. Your account will be blocked here too if you continue your disruptive editing. I'm aware of your guwiki ban. Regards! -- CptViraj (📧) 13:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019 Saurashtra Premier League

The article 2019 Saurashtra Premier League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable tournament which fails WP:NCRIC. There is very little coverage of the event beyond what would be WP:ROUTINE (mostly scorecards on Cricinfo). Also fails WP:EVENT. WP:GNG not really satisfied either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Saurashtra Premier League

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saurashtra Premier League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saurashtra Premier League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurashtra Premier League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]