User talk:HardCandy08

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 4 Minutes (Madonna song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - eo (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CHARTS, WP:NOT#IINFO

Please stop adding charts data to this article pertaining to only certain U.S. radio stations or one retailer (i.e. iTunes Store). This information has been previously removed; please stop re-adding it.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 4 Minutes (Madonna song). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

please stop adding component charts to song article charts tables

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 4 Minutes (Madonna song). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 20:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 4 Minutes (Madonna song), you will be blocked from editing. Lillygirl (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna singles discography

There is no justification to keep re-adding this column. It clearly separates the U.S. chart from all of the other countries represented (WP:NPOV) and it is in violation of WP:NOT#IINFO. No other discography pages have this and U.S. "weeks on chart" information can be added to individual song articles, if it is not there already. Please stop reverting this.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Madonna singles discography. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Christina Aguilera discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 17:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna Albums sales

Please if you change madonna´s albums sales you must put sources to show if the change is real, stop putting unreal sales.--Albes29 (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use official sources, do not use Fans websites to put sales on Madonna´s discography, we have to put the real sales, normally fans put more than the real sales, I think amazon.co.uk is a very good web to see the real sales, We are fans but we have to say the true. --Albes29 (talk) 21:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use official sources, do not use Fans websites to put sales on Madonna´s discography--Albes29 (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the Madonna´s album sales if you do not have official sources, Thanks--Albes29 (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not take off the sources from the Madonna´s Album sales, is the only way people can see the real sales, Thanks, Bye--Albes29 (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing Madonna´s album sales if you do not have official sources, do not use anymore Fans websites, as you did to Madonna album discography. I have told you many times to don´t do it, we are Madonna´s fan but we have to put the right sales, Thanks--Albes29 (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your link is not official, that is fans website and that is not official for Wikipedia, everyone know that to find a place with all the real sales is difficult, I do not about the others albums sales but in the case of Confessions on a Dance Floor I show you a link from an article from Warner Bros. Records, that is completely official and they do not lie, then please stop putting that the sales are 12 million because is not true, read this http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=849268 and is from 1 month ago.--Albes29 (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sources in Madonna´s Albums sales is www.madonna.com and there you can read that "True Blue" is Madonna's biggest selling studio album worldwide, with estimated sales at 19 million check here : http://madonna.com/music/?v=&a=1&id=3 and The Immaculate Collection has sold 22 million (10 in US and 12 outside América): http://madonna.com/music/?v=a&a=1&id=24, please stop putting biggest sales because they are not real, you are using sales from www.worldwidealbums.net which is not afficial and is considered spam by wikipedia, if you want the real sales check every album in Madonna´s Official site www.madonna.com. You can check that CODF has sold more than 8 millon not 9: http://www.warnermusic.com.au/newsoverview ( Official Warner site in Australia). Sorry for my english.--Albes29 (talk) 12:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey albums discography

Hi, I see you've tried to add a weeks on chart column to the Mariah Carey albums discography article on a couple of occasions. There seems to have been a consensus earlier that this wasn't suitable information to include within this article (too US-centric and not really relevant discography information), so I think the issue needs to be discussed on the article talk page. There's a section on the talk page where I've raised this, please add your thoughts. Gusworld (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff discography

Hi, please don't add the number of weeks an album has been on the chart - see WP:CHARTS. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey albums discography sales reference

Please stop removing the reference to the global sales figure for The Emancipation Of Mimi in Mariah Carey albums discography. As well as not being justified with a reason whenever the change is made, this reference is also used again later in the article, and your repeated removal results in a broken reference.If you have a specific problem with the source, please raise it on the talk page. Thanks. Gusworld (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]