User talk:Happyeggplant

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:Anthony.bradbury has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 19:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

Are you also Meqdim? Bear in mind that while this is not of itself an offence, we can confirm your answer if it seems necessary. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Vandalising my page will not advance your cause. It is liable, on repetition ,to get you blocked from editing. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kirkpatrick McGuire

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kirkpatrick McGuire, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Count Basie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyeggplant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have realized the error of my ways and vow to never again edit in a vandalizing sort of way. I give my scouts honor.

Decline reason:

You had ample opportunity to realize the error of your ways while you were ignoring warnings, and I'm certain that you knew vandalism was wrong before you ever joined Wikipedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I believe I have served enough time being blocked as it has now been nearly six months. I promise to use my privilege to edit in a constructive manner only. Thank you for your consideration.}}

I figure we might as well give this another shot; I've contacted the blocking admin about your request. In the meantime, feel free to peruse this introduction for newcomers. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Request handled by: Someguy1221 (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request. |}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyeggplant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was under the assumption, given the granted request shown above, that my account was unblocked nearly 2 years ago. I am just finding out now, as I return to Wikipedia, that I am still unable to edit. I would think after a two year time period I should be relieved of my punishment. Please act accordingly. My thanks for your time.

Decline reason:

As explained below, you resumed your vandalism after you were unblocked, and were subsequently reblocked. You will need to address that if you wish to be considered for unblock. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked again when you made this edit. So what is it you plan to do when you're unblocked? Someguy1221 (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyeggplant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After reading my last "supposed" vandalism edit, I realize that this was not vandalism at all. If you will notice, I was simply requesting to be eligible for nomination for "adminship" and I was under the impression that the "nominations" sections was where I would nominate myself. Again, even if you believe this was vandalism, even though it clearly wasn't, that "incident" was 18 months ago. By now, after not even attempting to edit until yesterday, I am ready to edit constructively.

Decline reason:

It's abundantly clear that you have no intention of contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Your talk page access will be revoked. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hmm, adding yourself to the requests for bureaucrat section, with the nomination statement "A strong leader, a devoted wikipedian, and a well-respected member of several prestigious organizations. I thank you for your support!", when you had only made 9 prior edits and had been blocked for vandalism, was a serious attempt at nominating yourself for admin? I can understand why the blocking admin did not see it that way. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

UTRS 2385

Your unblock appeal via UTRS (Admins, ticket 2385) has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules. --- Completed: 7/9/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC))
• Read our guide to improving articles--- Completed 7/9/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC))
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.--- Completed 7/9/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC))
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
• Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.--- Completed 7/9/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC))
• Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it. --- Completed 7/9/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC))
• Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.--- Completed 7/10/12- (Happyeggplant (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC))
• When you are done with your work, request unblocking on this page using the {{unblock}} template and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute

St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute
Address
845 Kenmore Avenue Town of Tonawanda Buffalo , Erie County , New York 14223 United States
Coordinates	42.959°N 78.849°W / 42.959; -78.849
Information
Type	Private, All-Male
Motto	Signum Fidei (Sign of Faith)
Religious affiliation(s)	Roman Catholic; Christian Brothers
Patron saint(s)	St. Jean-Baptiste de La Salle
Established	1861
Founder	De La Salle Christian Brothers
School district	Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo
CEEB code	331-095
President	Robert Scott, AFSC
Principal	Robert Scott, AFSC
Faculty	60
Grades	9–12
Enrollment	765 (2010–11)
Student to teacher ratio	14:1
Color(s)	Maroon, Silver, and White
Song	When The Saints Go Marching In
Athletics conference	Monsignor Martin Athletic Association
Sports	Football, Soccer, Track and Field, Indoor Track, Cross Country, Hockey, Bowling, Basketball, Baseball, Swimming, and Lacrosse.
Mascot	Masked Marauder
Team name	Marauders
Rival	Canisius High School
Accreditation	Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools
Publication	The Collegiate
Newspaper	Student Prints
Yearbook	Star
Tuition	$9,540 (2010–11 base)
Admissions Director	Peter Kennedy
Athletic Director	Pete Schneider
Website	http://www.sjci.com/

St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute, founded in 1861, is an independent Roman Catholic college preparatory school for young men. Established by the De La Salle Christian Brothers, SJCI is chartered by the Board of Regents of New York State and accredited by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools. It is a member of the Christian Brothers' Education Association, The College Board, and the National Catholic Education Association. It is located in the town of Tonawanda.

Mission

The mission of SJCI is to nurture and to educate young men within a Christ-centered community for lives of accomplishment and service in a Catholic Lasallian tradition.

History

The History of St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute is predated by only a few years by that of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo, which was established on April 23, 1847. The Very Reverend John Timon, named the first Bishop of Buffalo by Pope Pius IX, was consecrated in St. Patrick's Cathedral, New York City, on Sunday, October 17 and arrived in Buffalo on October 22, 1847.

In 1849, Bishop Timon moved into the Webster House on Franklin Street. Always concerned with vocations to the priesthood, he established in the rectory a seminary for three young men. The seminary was named St. Joseph's College because of a special veneration the bishop held for St. Joseph. Its early history was a varied one, as it moved from one location to another in several areas of the city.

Later in 1850., Bishop Timon asked the Oblates of Mary Immaculate to staff the seminary in his residence. On July 2, 1851, the Oblates arrived and opened a school chartered on March 12, 1851 under the name "The Buffalo College of St. Joseph," which Bishop Timon said, "...exists for missionary and no other purpose."

In August 1861, six Christian Brothers from New York and Montreal arrived in Buffalo and settled at 187 Terrace Street. Brother Crispian, Director of this first Christian Brothers' community in Buffalo, Brother Pompian (Sub-Director), Brothers Demedrian, Ptolemy, Benedict and one Brother whose religious name is unknown had come to the city in response to Bishop Timon's urgent plea for assistance in educating the Catholic youth of Buffalo.

The first building in which the Brothers taught was built by a local contractor, a Mr. Flanagan, at a cost of $7,000. Two departments were started in this first school on September 2, 1861: St. Joseph's Academy (a tuition school), with 130 boys registered, and St. Joseph's Free School, with 150 boys. The brick building was located opposite Union Terrace, which at that time was a beautiful park. The Free School was located on the first floor of the building, the Academy on the second floor., and the Brothers dormitory on the third floor. This building, later known as "Old Cathedral Hall," was located at 1 Delaware Avenue.

In response to numerous requests from clergy and parents, and after being closed for two years, St. Joseph's College reopened in September 1893. Due to the railroad station at Union Terrace and the encroachment of business and manufacturing interests, the Delaware Avenue site was no longer a desirable one. For what they knew would be a temporary stay, the Brothers rented a two-story brick building at 473 Prospect Avenue near Jersey Street which housed about fifty pupils during each of the four years the school occupied it.

In 1945, plans were again taken up for the "new St. Joe's" on Kenmore Avenue. Brother Andrew of the Cross-sponsored a drive to secure funds to commence the project. The proposed plan was to include three buildings: a general school building to accommodate 900 students, a gymnasium with three basketball courts and a seating capacity of 2000, and a faculty house with accommodations for thirty brothers. In addition, there were to be football and baseball fields, a quarter-mile cinder track, and facilities for other sports.

The first classes were held in the new building on April 19, 1950. In the years to follow, the new facility allowed for increases in both the size of the student body and the number of faculty members. Such facilities as a drafting room, photographic darkroom and a soda fountain were appealing to the students. The school also featured, according to news accounts of the day, such modern innovations" as a public address system linking the principal's office to all rooms of the school and green glass chalkboards, replacing the old familiar blackboards." The new building was dedicated on May 14, 1950.

On November 16, 2006, it was announced that alumnus Jack Cullen had made a gift of $2 million to support construction of new science laboratories and classrooms, as well as the annual school musical.[1] The gift is believed to be the largest gift ever awarded to a Buffalo high school. This gift, along with two other $1 million gifts from alumni, are the foundation for a $12 million capital campaign announced on May 15, 2007.[2]. The campaign seeks to build new science laboratories, an athletic complex, and a new residence for the Christian Brothers on campus, as well as increasing the endowment for financial aid.

Facilities

The campus of St. Joseph’s Collegiate Institute (SJCI or St. Joes) is located at 845 Kenmore Avenue in the town of Tonawanda (near Buffalo) and rests on 11.9 acres (48,000 m²). There are two buildings on the grounds: the Academic Building and a Field House. The Brothers Residence was torn down last spring and is now the site of the new science center.

Within St. Joseph’s Collegiate Institute, there are two academic computer labs, a newly updated Computer Graphics Lab in the art wing, and a Music Lab that employs Mac and Windows computers. The library also contains workstations for internet access. The Fine Arts facility includes a fully functioning black-box theatre, band room and sound-proof practice facilities. Athletics are also an integral part of the St. Joe’s experience and students are able to take advantage of both indoor and outdoor facilities. A modern weight room, two gymnasiums, athletic fields and a field house comprise the facilities of the athletic department.

The new Cullen Center for Excellence in science building was finished in fall 2009 and is presently in use. Classes include lab stations for each student and a work area. Smartboards are in each classroom as well

Sports

St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute offers an extensive athletic program consisting of 16 sports, with most sports offering multiple levels of competition. St. Joe's has won the Supremacy Cup, recognizing the top overall athletic program in the Monsignor Martin Athletic Association's AA League, 31 times in the 58 years of the league's existence. Unfortunitely St. Joe's athletic prowess has precipitiously declined in recent years, despite renovations to the school's athletic facilities, as the 2004-05 year was the only time the Marauders have won that championship in the past decade.

In addition to interscholastic competition, St. Joe's offers a number of intramural athletic programs and maintains a vocal group of student supporters at their major sports events.

The Marauders' main rival is Canisius High School. The Marauders' and the Crusaders' (Canisius High school) have a certain competitive mindset that can't be found in most places. The will and intensity both these schools have is incredible. The Marauders' have had many recent stars come from the school; such as, Naaman Roosevelt, John Greer and Devon Dawson. The most recent star, Chad Kelly, will graduate in 2012.

Visual and Performing Arts

The Visual and Performing Arts department at St. Joe's is recognized at local, regional, and national levels. The Visual Art Instructor and Department Chairperson is Catherine Ward. The Director of Instrumental Music is Russell Owens. The Director of Vocal Music is James Deiotte. The Theatre Arts Instructor and Director of both the Fall Drama and Spring Musical Productions is Paschal Frisina.

The Visual Arts program includes course in Studio in Art, Drawing and Painting, Graphic Arts, Digital Video Arts, and Advanced Placement Studio in Art. The Instrumental Music Program includes Beginner Music for Freshman Woodwind, Brass, and Percussion Players, Concert Band, Percussion Ensemble, Jazz Lab Band and Music Theory. The Vocal Music Program includes Beginner Music for Freshman Singers, Glee Club, Varsity Singers, and Swing Choir. The Theatre Program includes Introduction to Theatre, Advanced Drama, as well as opportunities to participate in the Fall Drama and the Spring Musical.

One unique program to St. Joe's is the Artist in Residence program. This program brings local arts professionals into the school to provide intensive workshops in a particular area of study in the arts. The workshops include such topics as Dance, Sculpture, Keyboarding Skills at the Piano, Stage Combat, Mime, Performance on String Instruments, and Graphic Design, among others.

Notable alumni

• Jimmy Collins – first player selected to the Baseball Hall of Fame primarily as a third baseman
• Don Criqui – football commentator for CBS Sports and the University of Notre Dame and member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame
• James Demske – president, Canisius College (1966–1993)
• William "Wild Bill" Joseph Donovan – lawyer, general and founder of the Office of Strategic Services, winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor, "founder" of the CIA
• John Patrick Hopkins – mayor of Chicago (1893–1895)
• John J. Hurley – president, Canisius College (2009–present)
• Jim Malone – head strength & conditioning coach, San Diego Padres
• Christopher Markus – Emmy Award-winning screenwriter, best known for The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and The Life and Death of Peter Sellers
• Vaughn Parker – former NFL tackle, San Diego Chargers and Washington Redskins
• Bill Paxon – U.S. Representative, 1989-1999
• Carmen A. Puliafito – dean, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California
• James Edward Quigley – Archbishop of Chicago, 1903–1915
• Naaman Roosevelt – wide receiver, Buffalo Bills
• Sean Ryan – tight end, National Football League
• William F. Sheehan – lawyer and politician, Lieutenant Governor of New York (1892–1894)
• Jud Strunk – singer, songwriter, and comedian
• Robert G. Ortt - mayor of North Tonawanda, NY

External links

• St. Joseph's Collegiate Institute

Diff showing proposed changes Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 15:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm not terribly impressed, but I'll leave it for others to review. The claim that the department is recognized at those levels is not supported by the given source. A listing of classes doesn't provide much useful information (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). The artist-in-residence program could be interesting to include, however the claim that it is unique is unsupported. Furthermore, all of the sources you have provided are first-party sources; reliable sources include sources independent of the subject. First-party sources can be used to provide additional detail, but independent sources should be included first for verification of the information presented. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 15:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

It appears what I have done is not yet suitable for publishing given your remarks above. I will continue to expand on the information I have previously included to be more thorough. I will provide more sources once I am able to locate them. Moving on to a brief note on grammar, the phrase "all of " should only be used with pronouns, such as us, you, and it. The correct way to phrase your statement about the sources would be "all the sources you have provided..." Just for clarification.

Thank you for the input thus far. (Happyeggplant (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC))

{{unblock|I think my work that was previously shown on my talk page was deleted on accident. I did not not receive any official response other than a few suggestions for Hersfold. As I had previously written in my response to his corrections, I will continue to expand on the subject I have been working on; however, I will need go back into my history to find some of my previously listed information. If someone can shed some light as to what may have happened to my editing project and the following discussions on my talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time.}} Without commenting on the unblock request, I removed it because I misread something above. I don't have any objections to restoring it, but I'd rather another admin have a look first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:07, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Great. Thank you for clarifying that. (Happyeggplant (talk) 04:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC))

Where is the page you modified? -- Selket ^Talk 21:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

I've restored the removed content. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Before I continue to make additions and edits, I will wait for a few more opinions and suggestions from other administrators. In light of recent events, I want to make sure I am as thorough and as careful as possible. I want to see if anyone else would like to throw some ingredients into this batter.- Happyeggplant (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

That's not how this works: you are supposed to give us a good idea of the types of edits you can perform if unblocked, and provide a good reason to re-release you upon the project. You don't get help, other than the whole whack of policies you have been provided over your "career" (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

My apologies. I read the statement under UTRS 2385 heading, "If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{helpme|your question here}" to your talk page. Thank you. -Hersfold," and thought it was an indication that this might be a possibility. Again, my mistake. - Happyeggplant (talk) 03:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I have also gone back and provided some more support for the 1st statement of my article edit section. I believe this was initially an issue with Hersfold. Perhaps what I have included with that 1st statement is now more of what you were looking for. -Happyeggplant (talk) 04:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

If we are going to correct each other's grammar, then I could ask you to look at "I have also went back.....". That aside, as one of the editors who were the targets of this editor's vandalism some three years ago, I am personally prepared to believe that s/he has matured to the point of being a sensible editor. I will not unblock, being too involved, but would favour a last chance - on the clear understanding that any further deliberate vandalism would inevitably lead to an immediate, permanent block with no prospect of reprieve.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

As I have told this editor via e-mail, I am prepared to act as mentor in the event of an unblock being granted. I look forward to a positive comment from this editor, and possibly from an uninvolved admin. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

I welcome the privilege to have a mentor for support and assistance. I hope that an uninvolved administrator will be willing to unblock me under these conditions. Thanks to Anthony Bradbury for his support. (Happyeggplant (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC))

I have contacted the blocking admin, and await his or another admin's response. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Anthony, I'm not impressed with those edits at all, but the goal of requiring editors to improve an article is not, IMO, to improve an article but to show some awareness and some good faith. I don't want to overrule Hersfold (whose response we await, I imagine), but I have no objection to an unblock. Thanks for your offer of mentorship, Drmies (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't wait on me; if you're comfortable unblocking, go ahead. Having a mentor makes me a bit less concerned about this. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 14:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

The edits are not brilliant; I am trying to recover an editor who may, if his and our attitude is correct, become valuable to the project. If HEP disappoints me/us, then he is blocked and forgotten; but I would like to rehabilitate him if this is what he wants, and his edits suggest that it is. Happyeggplant, please upon your unblock keep in touch with me in terms of your intended edits. Any major edits I would like to scan before they are posted; other edits I will be watching for. You do not have a great deal of experience as far as your edit count would suggest. Please consult me if you have any problem, or doubt about any edits. Any edit conflict please come to me immediately. Please bear in mind that you nare on trial here, and the community is not noted for its tolerance. Also bear in mind that by supporting you I am also, to some extent, on trial. Please do not let me down.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)