User talk:Hanso671
February 2009
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Dawkins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Richard BB 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic, you will be blocked from editing. Marauder40 (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I did not give you the warning because I am a supporter of Richard Dawkins (although I am, that is irrelevant), I did it because of the vandalism. Even if you had vandalised the creationist article, I would have reverted the edits and made the same action - not because I believe in one thing or the other but because I am trying to help maintain Wikipedia. Please do not vandalise article in future just because you do not like the subject matter (or for any reason, for that matter). Richard BB 00:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Encyclopedia of stupid"
[edit]A page you created, Encyclopedia of stupid, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)