User talk:Hans yulun lai

Welcome!

Hello, Hans yulun lai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —

Keep up the good work. --Haemo 09:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Foot Kang an

A tag has been placed on Foot Kang an, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 05:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fu Kangan

Hi! The article you wrote, Fu Kangan (originally titled Foot Kang ann), seems to be a computer-generated translation. Would you mind providing the original Chinese text in the interest of improving the translation? Thanks! nneonneo ^talk 15:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feng Kang from Shaoxing?

Hello. You added Category:People from Shaoxing to our article on Feng Kang. Why? As far as I can see from the article, he is from Nanjing and grew up in Suzhou, neither is in Shaoxing. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drogön Chögyal Phagpa

Please stop adding inappropriate categories an other unsourced statements to articles, as you have now repeatedly done with Drogön Chögyal Phagpa. --Latebird (talk) 15:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, I have reverted a lot of additions you made to Category:Culture heroes; if you read the article culture heroes, it refers only to mythological, and not real people. Thanks. --Rodhull andemu 23:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced statements / vandalism

Please stop adding inappropriate categories an other unsourced statements to articles, as you have now repeatedly done with Wei Zhongxian and Shunzhi Emperor. Your comments were not cited, and many were opinions not appropriate for an encyclopedia. I reverted the changes. Keithh (talk) 16:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reply： Keithh is not Chinese historian I thought.but, who care?

Keithh use source. And him speak Engrish goody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harsimaja (talk • contribs) 04:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wei June

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wei June, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wei June seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wei June, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Chanting

A tag has been placed on Sun Chanting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also want to move the page to EverythingWiki. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably a blocked user in zh.wikipedia.org

The writing style is very similar to that of zh:User:裕綸. This user has added incorrect information in a number of articles and is currently blocked by zh.wikipedia.org for a period of 6 months. --Mewaqua 14:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) and revised later[reply]

Speedy deletion of Qing's Yellow Chinese Jacket

A tag has been placed on Qing's Yellow Chinese Jacket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. andy (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tidal bore of Qiantang River

A tag has been placed on Tidal bore of Qiantang River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Temple of two towers

A tag has been placed on Temple of two towers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Broccoli (talk) 04:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gao Juehun

A tag has been placed on Gao Juehun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 12:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auguste_Léopold_Protet

This article, Auguste_Léopold_Protet, still has no sources outside of Wikipedia. In order to follow Wikipedia's policy of citing sources, you must cite source that don't include Wikipeida. If you have any questions, feel free to discuss it at the page. Please do not remove the unreferenced message again unless you add a non-Wikipedia source. Daniel Musto (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Gimme danger (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Yongzheng Emperor, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gimme danger (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Guangdong do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism

It was removed. Happy? DOR (HK) (talk) 04:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Unidentified flying object. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Liu Yalou

A tag has been placed on Liu Yalou, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spitfire^Tally-ho! 14:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Xie Tienshao

A tag has been placed on Xie Tienshao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scapler (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Beijing worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese

Yes, I read and speak putonghua, but not fluently. Why do you ask? DOR (HK) (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Battle of inlon river. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 22:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Puyi. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enigma^msg 22:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fujian Pocket

请问你的文章“Fujian Pocket"指太平天国的哪一个战役？战役的中文名字是什么？如果我们不能把这篇文章写清楚一些，可能会被删除。--Danaman5 (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Badger's Mount Campaign

A tag has been placed on Badger's Mount Campaign, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uw-joke1

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Yang Ye. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want.

English: You've been blocked by the Chinese Wikipedia until 2010. Do you wish to be blocked here also?
--Mewaqua (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of userpage

I can't stand all the nonsense you're writing on your userpage. Can you do something better than this instead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.75.89.23 (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hans yulun lai! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 87 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Liu Wen Zheng - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]