User talk:HansKeppel

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HansKeppel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Irn (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NtheP (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 21:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Alleged self-plagiarism by Bruno Frey and others, you may be blocked from editing. ZamorakO o (talk) 21:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HansKeppel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked without being provided any reasons. Many of my posts were removed while there was no reason to do so. Some of the posts were disputed but no clear consensus had been reached. Other posts, such as on the Bruno Frey and Felix Oberholzer-Gee page were without any doubt in accordance with Wikipedia rules. There has been no discussion on the content of the contentious materialHansKeppel (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is an ArbCom block and can only be reviewed/accepted by an arbitrator (per the block comment). To appeal this block to ArbCom, please e-mail arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I read te following: "To effectively contest your block, you must understand the reason for it. Also, if the reviewing administrator concludes that the block was justified, you will not be unblocked unless the reviewing administrator is convinced that you understand what you are blocked for, and that you will not do it again.

You are informed about the block reason in two ways. First, the blocking administrator provides a brief reason that you will see when you try to make an edit. Second, the administrator may leave a message explaining your block on your user talk page. These messages should include the names or abbreviations of those of our site rules (the "policies and guidelines") that the blocking administrator believes you have violated."

The reasons were not explained and I followed these guidelines: "To make an unblock request, copy the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: ((unblock |1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here}}. Don't forget to insert your own reason. We will discuss its composition below. If you find that you cannot edit your talk page, mail your unblock request to unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org."HansKeppel (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]