User talk:HansGeluk

Welcome!

Hi HansGeluk! I noticed your contributions to Annabel Nanninga and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! AP 499D25 (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!! I will study the link you sent me. Have a nice day, Hans Geluk HansGeluk (talk) 08:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish asylum model (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is currently structured like an argumentative essay trying to prove the superiority of the Danish asylum policy since 2015. The name "Danish asylum model" was not used by any cited sources to describe the post 2015 policy, instead only the last cited article use it to describe the proposed reform in 2021. Make sure to include sources demonstrating that the post 2015 is a term accepted by scholars or the public. The article should also have the following sections: 1) Lede, to summarize the subject; 2) Context, to explain why was the subject introduced in 2015; and 3) Effect, preferably backed up by scholarly research.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danish asylum model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tutwakhamoe,

Thanks a lot for your constructive criticism. I will edit the article thoroughly by restructuring it, adding reliable sources and give some attention to the cons of the Danish asylum model.

This might cost me some weeks though.

In the meantime I wish you a lot of nice summer days.

kind greetings

Hans Geluk HansGeluk (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HansGeluk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish asylum model (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Immigration to Denmark. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please don't merge this directly into the Immigration to Denmark article - there are lots of sources here that do not meet WP:RS. But the general idea, "Danish immigration policy since 2015", should be covered there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danish asylum model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danish asylum model

Hello, HansGeluk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danish asylum model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]