User talk:Hannahelong

Welcome!

Hello, Hannahelong, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Winter Plummer

A tag has been placed on Winter Plummer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carri leigh goodwin

Hello Hannahelong,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carri leigh goodwin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC) The topic is very important, but unfortunately not every rape victim can have encyclopedic entry. Wikipedia is not the news site. I advise you to look and expand this article - Sexual assault in the United States military in case you'd like to contribute for more deep coverage of the topic. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Winter Plummer

Hello Hannahelong,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Winter Plummer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carri Leigh Goodwin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carri Leigh Goodwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carri Leigh Goodwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How long to wait for feedback

Hi Hannahelong.

Now that you've posted your proposals on the talk page, I recommend getting to work on what those larger changes actually entail in your sandbox. It may take a few days for editors who are interested in the article to notice a change to the talk page. It is also possible that editors may not respond within a few days at all. If no one responds you can proceed with your changes with some caution--some editors may only engage with you on the talk page once you start making changes to the article. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great, I will get started. Thank you! Hannahelong (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Asma al-Assad page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Winter Plummer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Winter Plummer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Winter Plummer

Hello, Hannahelong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Winter Plummer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]