User talk:Hannah K John

Welcome!

Welcome, Hannah K John!

Hello, Hannah K John, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUNEYE1 07:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC) [reply]

This is Hannah K John's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kariyil Schism (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kariyil Schism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kariyil Schism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 14:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hannah K John! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 14:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kariyil Schism has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kariyil Schism. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reliable sources

In this edit, you have produced a virtually unreadable screed consisting of quotations of a lot of Canon Law sections and Papal missives, but you have not produced any reliable source that has stated that an actual schism has occurred or been declared. If you are relying on your own interpretation of these primary sources to conclude that a schism has occurred, that is original research and is not allowed at Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Syro-Malabar Catholic Major Archeparchy of Ernakulam–Angamaly shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your content is disputed. You must discuss it before further editing. If not, your actions will be reported to administrators for proper attention. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research and edit warring

Wikipedia has a policy forbidding original research and edit warring. The edits you have introduced do not seem to support your assertions, and you are coming to conclusions not contained in them. As Wikipedia is built on reliable sources, this is not acceptable. To your credit, you have started a discussion at Talk:Syro-Malabar Catholic Major Archeparchy of Ernakulam–Angamaly § Invalid explanation. However, two different editors (and now me) are telling you that these edits are inappropriate. As Wikipedia works on consensus (you can think of it as decision-making through discussion), you are obliged to try to address those editors' concerns instead of continually reverting their edits. When consensus is against you (as seems to be the case in this instance), it is considered disruptive to continue reverting, and very often results in blocks from editing. Please cease your actions and discuss. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Kariyil Schism.The discussion is about the topic topic. Thank you. --WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kariyil Schism

Hello, Hannah K John. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kariyil Schism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kariyil Schism

Hello, Hannah K John. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kariyil Schism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]