User talk:HannahSharpe
Welcome!
[edit]
|
September 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saint-Martin-sur-Armançon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saint-Martin-sur-Armançon was changed by HannahSharpe (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-05T03:02:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
User Page looks fine. You are off to a good start. Well --- other than the vandalism warning!!! How did you end up blanking that page? --JimmyButler (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Experimenting with the "random article" link? :) Tim Vickers (talk) 02:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Not a problem, everything you do here is reversible so you can't break anything. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi HannahSharpe
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Hi HannahSharpe, I'm Prom3th3an and I am a experienced editor and helper of wikipedia. I have recently discovered your class's wikiproject and would like to thankyou for taking the time to contribute to Wikipedia with (what I can tell) upmost enthusiasm. Your effort is greatly appreciated. I look forward to seeing the end result of your article mid next year and most likly drop in and offer advice to you along the way as I am freely available to answer any quires you may have. A final word of advice would be WP:BEBOLD. All the Best «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC) |
A tips from User:Prom3th3an
[edit] | Tip: If your making lots of small changes to a page, rather then clicking "Save page" for every change to see how it looks, Use "Show preview" between changes. When you have done editing a page for the time being, then you click "Save page". The reason for this is so you don’t make a save for every little thing you change, thus creating more revisions than necessary. For more information, ask your teacher or contact me on my talk page . |
| Tip: When you make a change to an article page, its good practice to fill out the Edit summary field. The edit summary field is a small text box above the Save Page button where you can briefly describe the changes you have made. The reason this is good practice is it tells other users what you changed without them having to view the revision. It also makes it easy to find a particuler edit in the page history should you wish to UNDO an edit or see the date of a change. |
Encylopedia
[edit]Cingulum (anatomy) Do you feel that the addition of the complete abstract from an article in the PubMed data base, contributed to the understanding of that particular topic in a meaningful way?
Please consider the following guidelines:
- Perhaps consider this guideline when introducing information as well:
Scientific journals and Research papers. A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the lead and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
I would revert the page back to the original stub and consider just adding a citation to the article you are working on. --JimmyButler (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I saw that your class was looking for mentors for your project, so I went ahead and signed up. I think it's a great idea that you are writing a biology paper and at the same time creating an article that will be useful to people around the world. If you have any questions about writing, referencing sources, reviews, or article formatting, don't hesitate to post a message on my talk page. Anything that I think can be improved in your article will be noted on the article talk page. My wife knows a lot more than I do about birth issues; I will see if I can get her advice as well. I'm looking forward to working with you to get your article promoted to GA or maybe even FA. Wronkiew (talk) 05:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)