User talk:Hangman'sDeath
@ Maxim
[edit]
Hangman'sDeath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@Maxim: Hello Maxim since you blocked my I direct this to you. I wonder how anybody could say that this account is a socket puppet of Manfred.ruzicka. No idea who and how on earth would even come to decision that stupid. I noticed the block because I was about to revert the edit of a vandal on Jeremy Hanson. A socket puppet would sure do something like this, right? If Wikipedia prefers to have images replaced by that on Osama Bin Laden they might as well get a bot for it. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That doesn't explain why you're on the same IP address as User:Ruzima. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hangman'sDeath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@NinjaRobotPirate: This is a company network shared by I don't know how many. Maybe hundreds, maybe thousands. I expect there to be a bunch of dicks on there. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Today was a really rough day, man! So many troll edits with uploading own images to Commons where I am not blocked. I wonder how long until they notice it. On Commons they sure have a strange fetish when they let me practically do heart surgery on there while I'm blocked here on the best, the only, the almighty english Wikipedia. The block and this unblock procedure is "a joke" - to put it into the nicest words I have for it and it's duration --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 11:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unless you are globally blocked, it is up to the admins at each individual wiki to decide whether to block you. And it seems like you have not done anything there to merit any sanctions so far.
Since the general tone of your request is more of a general attack on this whole process as opposed to an argument for unblock, I think you would (with some regret, no doubt) agree with me that you are not demonstrating a healthy attitude and so it is in both our interests that we not unblock you at this time.
Lastly, I would also recommend that if you post another request you do not take the same tone as this one. This is your third request; many administrators would have revoked your talk page access after this decline. I'm not, but if you choose to post another request and it continues to seem like you're more interested in talking smack about us than arguing for unblock, then I would recommend to another reviewing admin that your talk page access be revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please do not remove declined unblock requests. They must stay on your talk page until you're unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hangman'sDeath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I got blocked for some shady reason. Some checkuser saw that I have the same IP as someone else and the account was block for indefinite time even there is a logical and sane explanation for this and there are many edits on Commons that show I'm not a troll. Let's not check these edits. Rather block the user without a second thought just to be sure.
What a nice way of a platform that thinks of so highly of itself for spreading free knowledge. In fact it is very close to a fascist 'I am always right' like behaviour and presumption of guilt. GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT! OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!! Better block other all accounts on Wikipedia as well just in case this user does not only have multiple accounts under one IP but maybe some more on different IPs.
Two weeks without any comment on this by @Maxim: who seem to be quick on the block button, but unblocks have to checked very thoroughly. Of course after the vacation and only if there is the desire to look into old cases that were obviously closed without any error --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 13:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One open unblock request at a time, please. As you already have a request open above, I will close this one. You are more than welcome to make replies, or ask questions without the {{unblock}} formatting. SQLQuery Me! 05:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.