User talk:Handlebarman

Hello, Handlebarman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Vsmith (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Handlebarman, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 06:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Hi, I am glad to hear that. I am with Wikipedia since 2005 and seems to me, that Wikipedia is difficult for new users.

Juandev (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Hello there! It takes about 2-3 weeks of using Wikipedia. Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia , please don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Handlebarman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of user Rotsmasher and I am not a SPA Handlebarman (talk) 13:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, you are.

Your edits on Optical Express, all the way down to your edit summaries, are substantially identical to those of Rotsmasher (talk · contribs) and Rots2 (talk · contribs). "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck."
Furthermore, your edits reveal a lack of understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, such as Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:no original research. I am not convinced that unblocking you will benefit Wikipedia. Declined.

Any further unblock requests should be made from your original account, including a full disclosure of all your accounts and explanation of your understanding why you were blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Handlebarman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was accused of being an SPA in my original block. I have edited many different topics so that is not true. I supported all edits on Optical Express with references that are published. having reviewed edits by Rotsmasher and Rots2 I do not accept that my edits are the same. I would respectfully like to appeal the block and I would like to know what I can do (apart from saying I am Rotsmasher) to aid this Handlebarman (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, you have edited on other topics (perhaps because your earliest account was described as a "single-purpose account" by the blocking administrator, or perhaps not). However, that does not in any way detract from the fact that you are perfectly evidently the same person. You give yourself away so blatantly, but, alas, I must resist the temptation to tell you how you give yourself away. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may wish to read WP:NOTTHEM and edit the above accordingly dangerous panda 18:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]