User talk:Hamstersanonymous

Welcome!

Hello, Hamstersanonymous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Huaiwei 10:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Find the rest of the Singapore community!

Yeap, you can find us in these pages:

Singapore portal
SGpedians' notice board (apparantly you found this already)
Current events in Malaysia and Singapore
Singapore-related topics
Complete to do list
Singapore Wikipedians

Thanks again for making wikipedia your online abode! ;) --Huaiwei 10:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the booya! It's nice to be welcomed. Also thanks for moving the criminal inquiry link to Nicoll Highway collapse which I'd missed. Guess I'll be fleshing that stub out a bit with inquiry findings. But on that page: quote "Catherine Tan's father" - Catherine who? --Hamstersanonymous 19:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hah its alright. I found it strange why the Circle line page had no links to the Nicoll Highway collapse page, so I am not surprised you didnt find it too. I added that link and moved it, as I faintly recollect seeing that page's existance before. As for Catherine....I think she is the daughter of one of the dead men? The one who's body was recovered...--Huaiwei 05:37, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I'm just nitpicking: that one-off sentence is not expanded upon; she is not well-known figure nor an important figure in the incident. Hence I don't think the name adds any useful information to the article. The same probably goes for "Mr Nuorinthong" - "Thai worker" alone suffices. What do you think? --Hamstersanonymous 09:42, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hm....I just read the article, and I realise what you mean. Yes...the sentence on Catherine sounds strange. Listing the names of the deceased and a litle on their background shold be more then enough. but as for the Thai guy's name, perhaps we can leave it as it is (preferably with the presumption that the entire article is xpanded), as we dont want to be accused of being "elitist" or even "racist"? :D--Huaiwei 15:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Am working on expanding/rewording the article atm, see my sandbox. Mr Nuorinthong isn't the only person who recounted Mr Heng's bravery, and he isn't an important figure in the investigation; I thought substituted with " survivor accounts" is pretty sufficient. Hamstersanonymous 08:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hoho...then we shall revisit this issue after the new version is done? Thanks for all the effort! ;) --Huaiwei 09:02, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SGCOTW

Hi, if you haven't noticed the Singapore COTW. You may like to take a look here. --Terence Ong ^Talk 10:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nicoll Highway press.jpg

Hello Hamstersanonymous, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nicoll Highway press.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Hamstersanonymous/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nomination

Thank you very much for the nomination, although I felt the article is obviously heavily biased towards Singapore in terms of content development! :D--Huaiwei (talk) 04:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 23 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article SLWH Pegasus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Did you know? was updated. On 23 November, 2007, facts from the articles 2010 Youth Olympics bids, and 2010 Youth Olympic Games, which you recently nominated, were featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--WjBscribe 17:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:India/news

Please add the appropriate source before adding news content to this page. Here are some pointers in case you are not aware of:

Newest item goes on the top, older items are removed from the bottom.
If possible, provide a bolded link to an internal article UPDATED with the current event.
The entry must be previously noted in the latest events section of the Current events/India page.
Maintain the list between six to ten posts at a time.

Should you have any questions, write to me on my talk page. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion doesn’t matter in Wikipedia

I have very bad experience with Wikipedia, even when you have a reason to do something. “YOUR REASON NEVER GOOD ENOUGH” I started this article because I know “almost” everything about this coin, I have tried to change in the existed article many times, unfortunately someone will come and change it without any knowledge about this coin, also many of this people have a commercial interest. My goal to present this coin from history point of view for Wikipedia reader and by merging this article with the “IGD” it will be tragedy. I really cannot do anything. The only thing I want is not to merge the two articles. I wish I can just delete it if that makes you happy. In the end of the day you do what you like because my reason is not good enough. Wish you the best.

(ZeroFiveZerome (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

I cannot agree with you more

Your respond was great. I was little bit hopeless with Wikipedia. Anyway I will be happy working with you in improving the 2 articles and when we feel that one is covering everything necessary then we can merge the two articles. I thing we have long way to go before the article look great. I will be adding some more material and you can check it and let me know what you think. I will try to have more time for writing.

I would like to thank you for your time and patient with my attitude. I had good intention nothing more. You made me more optimistic.

Best regards

(ZeroFiveZerome (talk) 11:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]