User talk:Hammerstown3

Hi, Hammerstown3.

I've taken a look at some of your edits to Wikipedia, and also your citing of wiki policy, as well as your use of mark-up and citation formatting, etc., and I'm prompted to ask if I should just go ahead and assume that you are an experienced editor here under a new user name. It would save me a lot of time explaining policies and conventions of which you are probably already fully aware. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 12:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Xenophrenic (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]