User talk:Hammerpleasedonthurtem

Welcome

Hello, Hammerpleasedonthurtem, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to [[{{{article}}}]].

Also, Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 12:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Hammerpleasedonthurtem, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Hammerpleasedonthurtem! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Rahall, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. As was explained to you already, material that is reflected in the text is properly reflected in the lede. Stop removing it on the basis that it is already stated in the text below. Also, as already indicated to you, the refs in the text are sufficient -- they need not be repeated in the lede. Also, please stop deleting material on the basis -- untrue -- that it is "libel", when it is nothing of the sort. Finally, please stop making deletions of this ilk unless you have consensus for the deletions, in the ongoing conversation taking place. Epeefleche (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you bother to read the talk page before you reverted my edits? It is difficult to WP:GF with your edits. Hammerpleasedonthurtem (talk) 21:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hammer -- you seem familiar. Have you edited wp under another user name? And/or as an IP? Epeefleche (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Hammer and do not know them. However, I did remove part of the lede and cited my reason as it was already stated in the main article (re anti-boycott resolution) - which I did in good faith. Both that and editing the page after clicking directly to the History page (from Twitter's @congress-editors) before reading the Talk page or noticing the banner ref to WP:BLP/N are admittedly my mistakes and I apologize. I appreciated your mention of WP:lede in your more recent undo of Hammer's edit which showed that my rationale for my previous edit was not applicable. 70.44.136.245 (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eve Weston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eve Weston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Weston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Karmasabtich (talk) 20:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]