User talk:Hammarbya

Recent edit to Rubus ulmifolius

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rubus ulmifolius, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hammarbya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 21:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rubus tuberculatus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rubus tuberculatus.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Plant articles are improved by the addition of infoboxes and need categories. If yo look at the edits I'll make in the near future this may assist you in any further additions to plant articles. Thanks for your contributions and good work on including a reference

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 22:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren:Thanks very much for the feedback. Please let me know of any other improvements I can make, if you have time/inclination

Hammarbya (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speciesboxes

Hi, although {{Speciesbox}} does work without parameters to specify the taxon, these are considered good practice. You can either use |taxon= (as I've done at e.g. Rubus nessensis) or use the combination |genus=+|species=. Category:Speciesboxes relying on page title tracks articles not explicitly specifying the taxon, so someone will clean them up eventually.

Season's greetings! Peter coxhead (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rubus nessensis) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rubus nessensis.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 15:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rubus anglocandicans) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rubus anglocandicans.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

I've carried out some standard cleanup for a species article: I've added a taxon bar template and linked to articles on this species in other languages (this also links to Wikispecies). I've upgraded the journal citations by autofilling them in from the DOI number (which is the easiest way to do them-no typing and a link is inserted automatically). Someone else has also put a tag on the talk page marking it as for the attention of the plants working group (WikiProject). Hope that's all OK.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plant articles

Hi, good to see the articles you've been creating on Rubus and Sorbus. Could you have a look at e.g. Sorbus porrigentiformis, and see some of the features that you could usefully add:

The {{Speciesbox}} template is conventionally the first in the article.
You should include |taxon=.
The title of the article is put in bold at the first occurrence.
Please add {{reflist}} after the References heading.
Don't repeat a full reference. Give the first occurrence a name (by <ref name=SOMENAME>...</ref>) and then just use the named ref the next time (by <ref name=SOMENAME/>)
Categories should be added to articles – for large genera such as Rubus and Sorbus, this will be the genus name with a 'key' of the species name, e.g. "[[Category:Sorbus|porrigentiformis]]".

There's a lot more guidance at WP:PLANTS; perhaps start at the index.

Leave me a message on my talk page if I can help in any way. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, many thanks for the feedback. Yes some of these things I was unsure of. Hammarbya (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sorbus leighensis) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sorbus leighensis.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've done some standard things which are always necessary to do to finish a species article: I've added a taxonbar, tagged the talk page for attention of the plants WikiProject (working group) and added a category. (I've activated the taxobar to make it display-you do this by linking to Wikidata, Wikipedia's sister project that holds structured data like species records, but this isn't strictly necessary as a bot system does it eventually if you leave it. A taxobar, though, you have to put in the article yourself.)
The article really needed online citations so it could be verified, so I've added these. It's a shame that Watsonia doesn't seem to index its old articles by DOI so I could autofill the citations; still I have filled in three. I looked for CC-BY licensed photos which could be uploaded to Wikipedia, unfortunately there don't seem to be any. Where terms such as 'whitebeam' appeared first in the article I have made them into links.
A fairly newly identified species in a locality as well-surveyed as the British Isles is always something worth explaining, so I've added more information about the species' genetic makeup. Hope that's all OK. Please always feel free to contact me if you'd like help with something.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 07:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hammarbya, note that it's WP style to put " " between a figure and a unit, e.g. "6 cm". Peter coxhead (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm IAmChaos. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]