User talk:Hambra1

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An user removed all the good edits thats why. Why do you block me when i stopped vandalism?? Hambra1 (talk) 01:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually trying to find out what is going on, but I can't do that while you, with your brand-new account, are undoing a slew of edits without even bothering to explain what you are doing. What do you think this is, just some website where you can do what you want? From my point of view, your edits are vandalism as much as theirs were. Drmies (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, luister. I don't know if you're related to this, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lala migos/Archive. If you are, that's not good. Either way, there are things you can do on Wikipedia, and things that you can't. The things that you can do, they will have to start with you talking, and not in this dismissive way. And I can help. What you can't do, is socking, making unexplained reverts, digging in your heels as if you're right and everyone should know it: that is not going to get you anywhere, even if your cause is right. I saw this, and that's great, and I sympathize, but I'm also an administrator who has to make sure that people get to work here without disruption. If you can try to work here without disruption, you can work here--if not, your edits will always be reverted and you'll have nothing to show for it, nothing for all the people back home in Morocco and all across North Africa. You might feel proud about having made a stand, but it won't make a difference. So speak. Don't start reverting again when this block runs out, but speak. Het beste: ik praat liever dan ik blokkeer. Drmies (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Best user MWahaiibii tries to Arabize anything that is not Arabic. some example: All persons to whom I have added the Berber name come from Morocco, where both Arabic and Berber are the official languages. so if their names are written in Arabic because they are Moroccan, it should be in Berber too. In addition, all those people to whom I have added the Berber names are Berber language, so why only Arabic. This user also has to hide the Berber identity on Berber's pages and make it look secretly Arabic. Why you're blocking me for no reason while he's screwing up here is a big question to me. Finally, I am not some Lala migos and I don't want you to accuse me of it. Hambra1 (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for your disruptive, unexplained edits--if you don't understand how that is a blockable offense, please read Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Or perhaps this collaborative project is not for you. Here is the thing: I actually am very sympathetic towards what I think you're trying to do, but I wonder if you read all that I wrote on User talk:MWahaiibii. Now, if you go around reverting edits and inserting information without any kind of explanation, you can expect to be blocked again and again. I strongly suggest you try to edit differently. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen what you wrote and i appreciate it because now you know what i was doing was something just. So would you please let me to set things right. I will give explanations with the edits. Hambra1 (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "legitimate edit that was unfairly rolled back" isn't much of an explanation, you know. I saw your note on User talk:MWahaiibii, but I have to tell you, you HAVE to stop with those personal attacks. Don't accuse someone of erasing Berber identity: see WP:AGF. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Now what is it what you want? You know the berber names has to be their, if someone delete kt and makes it Arabic, how would you call it? Hambra1 (talk) 00:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is not a "what I want now"--AGF is not negotiable. I don't know that the name has to be there, though I can see why they should be there. Don't forget that this is also a collaborative project, that consensus determine our editing practices; what I would call their edits--well, I've already called them that: unexplained. That should be enough. I am not going to speculate on motives or cast aspersions.
    I saw your comment at User talk:M.Bitton; please keep those things for the article talk page, which is, in the end, where such discussions should be had and where a consensus can be recorded for future reference. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - That brief conversation is now moved to Talk:Almohad_Caliphate#Tifinagh. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]