User talk:Hallwang Clinic

Hallwang Clinic GmbH

If you want to see improvements to this article I suggest you raise them on the talkpage, rather then editting it yourself, as you clearly have a conflict of interest. Additions need to be referenced to reliable external sources.Rathfelder (talk) 13:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This is the Hallwang Clinic: Provide us your legal contact details since you are anonymously publishing false, negative and derogative information leading to defamatory libel, damaging our reputation. We will take all possible legal actions against anyone presenting false statements to compensate for any damage of our reputation, as well as financial damage caused by these false statements. We request no further major editing without a discussion here at the Talk page since this would further distribute and present the false statements. Mr. Rathfelder you can contact us via [REDACTED-THEGOODUSER]. We have seen online that you keep buisiness relationships to the NHS Hallwang Clinic (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

I have been and am a volunteer with various NHS institutions. I do not have any business relationship with the NHS.Rathfelder (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Hallwang Clinic! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ----Finngall ^talk 16:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 16:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hallwang Clinic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here The artiucle is presenting false information

Decline reason:

You are welcome to be unblocked once you have unconditionally withdrawn your legal threats and state you won't make any further legal threats. Or alternatively, once your legal action is concluded. Yamla (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hallwang Clinic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

we have decided to unconditionally withdraw our legal threats and we are stating that we won't make any further legal threatsHallwang Clinic (talk) 17:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

That appears to settle the legal threat, but there are still other problems that you will need to address. I will provide a new block message, below, containing further instructions. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

I should also point out that shared accounts and accounts that imply shared use are not allowed on Wikipedia. You will also need to change your username and make sure everyone who has been using this account gets their own, individual, account. ("<foo> at Hallwang Clinic" would be an acceptable form of username.) —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 18:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

They should then also abide by our Conflict of Interest policies. Canterbury Tail talk 19:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)