User talk:Hallerworld

Hallerworld, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Hallerworld!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steve Cooper (film)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Steve Cooper (film), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at , you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessica Rothenberg

Hello Hallerworld,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jessica Rothenberg for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 08:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Feigco Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page And. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kendrick Brothers Productions

Hi Hallerworld. In its current state Kendrick Brothers Productions is eligible for speedy deletion. Would you like to move it to your sandbox or a draft page to work on it? Sam Walton (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And why are you blanking Hyde Park Entertainment? It seems to be a reasonable redirect. Sam Walton (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Mudd

I removed your deletion template from this article, since you did not actually indicate why it should be deleted. And since the article is sourced and discusses a production company that has had several major releases, I could not come up with anything obvious. FYI. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Dead Hand (film)

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Sam Walton (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

West from Heaven has also been deleted for the same reason, I can find precisely zero evidence that either of these films exist. Sam Walton (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also stop uploading copyrighted images with free licenses. Sam Walton (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Wikipedia has minimum standard of civility. Edits like this are not acceptable. We are a collaborative environment and hostile behaviour can result in a block. HighInBC 21:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax articles Figarden Drive Productions, Black Label Media and more

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Figarden Drive Productions. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. 64.134.65.105 (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Figarden Drive Productions deleted as a hoax, the wikipedia article was the only page that came up from a google search, though Black Label Media appears to exist. Consider this your last warning Hallerworld, no more articles on non-existing topics. Sam Walton (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm TyA. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Montecito Picture Company with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ty^(talk) 02:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 03:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HighInBC 03:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have already had warnings. The blanking, hoax articles and incivility need to stop. This is a short 48 hour block, but if you keep up the disruption you may just be blocked indefinitely. HighInBC 03:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hallerworld, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hallerworld. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gulfstream Pictures

Hi, I'm TheSandDoctor. Hallerworld, thanks for creating Gulfstream Pictures!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good job so far on this article! While it is definitely notable, more citations would be a major improvement.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BCDF Pictures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BCDF Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCDF Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gulfstream Pictures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulfstream Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulfstream Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]