Jump to content

User talk:Halfkept-456hj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Halfkept-456hj (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I wasn't vandalizing. I was trying reply to someone.

Decline reason:

Appears to be blatant vandalism, but if you can explain how you could be responding to something when you only registered the account a minute or so before (in other words, are you a sockpuppet?), we may reconsider the block. — Yamla (talk) 01:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Only one edit. No warnings. Second chance.

Request handled by: KnightLago (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? You just responded to me, so you're online. Are you ignoring me, now?

I heard you and am not ignoring you. You have been unblocked. Be good. KnightLago (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Halfkept-456hj (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

  1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
    Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
    If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
  2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
    If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
  3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
    1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
    2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.
Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 127.0.0.1 lifted or expired. Should be cleared, as the software isn't letting me clear it.

Request handled by: Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please click on this unblock link: [1] 127.0.0.1 is a generic IP address for the computer you're using (in this case Wikipedia´s). Look at the last template I added here. It has the same link to my autoblock (block ID).--Halfkept-456hj (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Autoblocked

[edit]

((unblock-auto|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Halfkept-456hj". The reason given for Halfkept-456hj's block is: "Vandalism-only account".|3=Nakon|4=879069))

Try now? – Luna Santin (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]