User talk:HalfShadow/Archive 3

Ouch!

Hi there. I noticed your deletion of the user page set up by User:Nonzionist. Well, I certainly can understand your interpretation of our policies. However, I'd like to ask you to handle this differently. The user is a newbiew. WP:BITE Why not contact the user and explain yourself in a friendly way? Open it up for some kind of discussion and give them a sense of where you might be flexible on this matter. Thanks muchly, HG | Talk 15:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. In light of our previous conversation (above), I'm wondering if you'd be willing to look at User:Einsteindonut. The most recent version looked like an attack page (on Wikipedia). I was thinking of bringing this up at AN/I, but perhaps it's more efficient to contact you. Take care, HG | Talk 04:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Risker's talk page

That is up to her, and for that matter this is a really easy way to find open proxies. Prodego ^talk 03:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I've taken away your rollback for using it to edit war. John Reaves 17:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After discussion with John Reaves I've restored the rollback flag, but you need to remember that it is to be used only for reverting vandalism. Rollback says "that edit was so worthless that it doesn't even justify an edit summary in reverting". Please remember that! Stifle (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For being one of the most swiftest and diligent reverter's there is. PoinDexta1 \| Talk to Me \| 21:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Sorkin

Hi: Have you seen how TERRIBLE the article is? It was actually even WORSE a few days ago. It is an absolute disaster. If you can help please do. I am removing all crap references... finding better ones. There's also NO criticism ANYWHERE in the article. ReelViews is one of the few reviews, and what kind of a critic is ReelViews? Notable? I think not. Please help me fix this disaster.Homely Features (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really, this article is FRIGHTENINGLY BAD. I can't believe it was an FA. Some of the worst prose I've ever read. A movie was made and shown in 1995... really, all production and release occurred in one year? What planet are these editors from?Homely Features (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your disinterest is OUTRAGEOUS! I'm just kidding. Hollering is the pay-off for attempt to refine this absolute disaster of an article.Homely Features (talk) 22:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptid Database

I think I know what kind of article he's trying to write. I'll keep an eye on it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just noticed that there's already an article about this. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrett O'Hearn

Heh. I did just that. I got your message just after I did so, actually. Great minds think alike :-) Bullzeye^{(Ring for Service)} 02:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually yes you can vandalize "your own page", because nobody actually owns anything here, with the exception of their userspace. But you're right, db-blank was the more specific CSD rationale. Bullzeye^{(Ring for Service)} 02:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny J

That article is a mess. Why does every word in a sentence need to be capitalized? And there are lots of references to Myspace. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did some cleanup. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's now spreading. I went to Google news to see if I could find any news sources, and that non-reliable website is issuing PR releases to PR sites repeating their claim. We need to make sure that if this does show up on any news sites, that they're using reliable sources, and not repeating the PR release. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm at my 3 revert limit, and the death is still being reported with no reliable sources. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 19:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being new to editing, I don't want to take that chance. I've listed it at WP:BLPN, and put a "blp" label on the Talk page. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 19:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait and see what happens on the BLP board. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 20:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: What do you think would go with a baagel?

Re your message: I prefer mine plaaain. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the bolding

and if it was obnoxious. i'm just really sick and tired of these baseless allegations and people continuing to try to do the same things to me. i wanted to state my piece loudly and leave. it's way up the list on the AN/I board and i'm just sick of all the negative attention and wanted to state my point loudly and clearly. again, my apologies is that is considered obnoxious. thanks for unbolding it.--Einsteindonut (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serial accuser of anti-Americanism

Back in March a wikipedian left you an accusation of anti-Americanism. They left similar accusations on half a dozen user's pages. You might be interested in my invitation for them to be more specific.

Yours in cooperation and collegiality. Geo Swan (talk) 21:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've got a fan

I hardblocked Ihatehalfshadow (talk · contribs). bibliomaniac 1 5 03:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for removing the stupid from my user page! -FlyingToaster (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just print!

File:Terry Fox Coin.jpg

Wsx7631

He gets one chance after the block to make a legitimate unblock request. If he spams again (before I go to bed), then you're right: the talk page gets protected. —C.Fred (talk) 04:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mahdi Balali-Mood

Hi there. Can you point me to the foreign-language Wiki that this article appears on? I did a quick bit of searching and was not able to find it. If it does not exist, then it should be tagged with {{notenglish}} and listed at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English for possible translation and further investigation. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. I know that it seems to be common practice (and many admins speedy them, incorrectly in my view), but Wikipedia:CSD#A2 specifically states that it's only for "Foreign language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project". I don't speak Arabic unfortunately, so I can't just pop over to arwiki to determine if they already have an article on the topic. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

No worries =). I agree that is frustrating when it happens, but if one of our sister projects can gain a half-decent article from it, then it won't be a total loss. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry about that

Somehow the warning was misdirected. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royalism

That's one way of looking at it. But if you look up Merriam-Webster, it simply directs you to the entry on monarchism [1]. American Heritage also agrees [2], as does Oxford [3]. The consensus seems to be that it is fully synonymous with "monarchism," with the latter definition being secondary or a rather uncommon usage. IranianGuy (talk) 04:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[4] Well done. Thank you. Pedro : Chat 22:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was needed and you made a good call. Again, thank you. Pedro : Chat 23:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that template should be subst:ed btw. But per Pedro, good call. Silly drama. – How do you turn this on (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...?

[5]?-- Jac16888 (talk) 00:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, can't say I blame you, would have whacked him myself, but I figured I might have filled up my quota for no more warning blocking this week--Jac16888 (talk) 00:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete page?

I’m not sure how this works, however, I had just read about a funny urban legend called Alexandria's Genesis, and I thought that it would be a good idea that wikipedia has a section about it. You want that to be deleted, true it is probably just a myth, but it is an interesting myth, a myth about a super-gene that gives long life and good health. I don’t believe that it is wrong to ad a section to wikipedia explaining the content of that myth. I would very much like you to explain to me why that is wrong to ad. rphb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rphb (talk • contribs) 23:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Then by all means delete it, it probely is to thin, but I jyst wanted to ad and make wikipedia better, not make up junk[reply]

My Userpage

Thank you for handling that vandalism. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 21:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hersfold ^(t/a/c) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for fighting the vandal on my userpage. :-) faithless (^speak) 23:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blanker

I'll be on for a while. If you want, you can report him directly to me and AIV. Justin^(Gmail?)_(u) 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: IP reverting User talk:Mannbay2008

That's not vandalism; Mannbay2008 is posting a huge goatse picture. HalfShadow 04:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I guess I just saw that he or she was blanking the page, so I reverted it. My bad, thanks for pointing it out. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree. =) Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 04:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for reverting the vandalism on my talkpage. Much appreciated :-). ~Beano~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey there. Awesome job with the vandal fighting and new page (NP) patrolling. Just wanted to let you know that if the author of the page removes a speedy tag from the article, you shouldn't use rollback to restore the tag unless that is the only thing that has been changed on the page. If they've modified the text of the article, you should simply readd the tag instead of reverting the edits. Again, great job with the vandal bashing. :) Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 00:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved removed

Hi, just letting you know that I removed your resolved tag which you added to the Fatal!ty AN/I thread, as the thread is clearly not closed (some of his purported accounts are still active). Just thought you might want to know. — neuro^(talk) 02:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chowder vs. Panini

It's original research because nobody else has officially said that she is more rabbitlike. Yes, she has bigger ears, but does that inherently make her more rabbitlike? We've verified through Greenblatt that Chowder and Panini are both cat/bear/rabbit things, but that's all we know. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your edit summary from [6], please review Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Just to let you know that I deleted and restored your talk page to remove a phone number. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dora the Explorer

Hi, I reverted this mistake, you accidently reverted to a vandalised version. Cheers,--Ashbey_{…whisper…} 02:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From my roof, that wicked paint job in the sky... Zat you?

Happy Christmas from Australia!

Happy Christmas, HalfShadow.
May you find time to refresh yourself,
and may you continue to enjoy wiki-ing, and tooling around the universe in 2009 ~ from Julia R. o<| =)

Julia Rossi (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fast Santa =) Julia Rossi (talk) 01:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:UltimateNullifier.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:UltimateNullifier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Greb (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Grand Director 001.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Director 001.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Grand Director 001.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Grand Director 001.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Don't bother warning anyone vandalising Jeske's page

Honestly, you'll just be wasting seconds you could be using to accomplish things with. The vandal will never see the warning and the IP will be blocked seconds later anyway. HalfShadow 04:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Jeske warned me only seconds before you did. I didn't realize they were being blocked immediately. Thanks for the heads-up on that. MelicansMatkin (talk) 04:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

I'd already written the part of editwarring AN3 but hadn't saved them, when I saw the additional comments from MastCell and Warden. Adding the rest was a mistake. --Ronz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk:Willcod

re: this diff I was just trying not to bite a newbie. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 21:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andres Rivera (Singer)

Hi there. I noticed you were trying to help with this article, but just FYI it's complete vandalism, a substantial copy of another article, Tyler James. On the same topic, do you have any idea how to undo the author's moves of both his user page and his user talk page to those of the article? I tried, but it didn't move the content back to the proper places (his user page and user talk pages). I wasn't sure whether there was a noticeboard for this stuff, either. I noticed you have rollback, so I wasn't sure whether you could possibly fix the mess yourself, or know where to ask for these moves to be undone. Raven1977 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 23:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Werdo

Apologies if I'm teaching you to suck eggs, but I saw your comment on the above page to the effect that you didn't know if the user existed or not. That page was created by another user, not Werdo, and has been deleted, but if you want to know if a user exists the easiest way is to search for them at Special:Listusers - that contains the list of all accounts ever registered. _Gb^T/c 23:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. _Gb^T/c 23:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!

You know, it's actually fun to sometimes do something really off the wall to a vandal like the one we "gave" the T-shirt to. You made my night. Can I offer you a cookie in lieu of a T-shirt? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Rollback

Hi HalfShadow. Would you mind explaing to me why you used rollback here? --Kanonkas : Talk 20:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good thing. However, I don't want to see such inappropriate use of the rollback tool again. --Kanonkas : Talk 10:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, HalfShadow!
I just wanted to let you know that I didn't mean to land you in hot water over that rollback edit. Dig through my contributions and I'm sure you'll find some rollbacks that shouldn't be there; mistakes happen, no big deal.
I only meant to send a message during the recent ANI report on the editor in question that we need to keep our story straight on what this person is doing wrong. I've been hunting down this guy's sockpuppets for about a year now and I would hate to have an uninvolved and under-informed administrator suspend any further investigation for reason that accusations of any and all wrondoings might constitute harassment. There are editors who are thouroughly frustrated with ABH's behaviour and might say or do anything to get him blocked; I only want to make sure he's blocked for the right reasons -- sockpuppetry. If bringing too much attention to your rollback caused you any inconvenience, I sincerely apologize because my intent was anything but.

Peace! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 17:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Backyardigans...

Thank heavens. (It was the "snack" edit that was killing me most--as in, how much time do these people seriously have on their hands to ANALYZE this stuff?) Good decruftification!! GJC 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jane Turner

I dont think its overly promotional. Just needs a general clean up. Besides the person is definitely notable.-Binary TSO ^???

Thanks

You might find this weird, but thanks for reverting my highlighting change. I realized I was breaking the rules and did so in accordance with WP:IAR. This was an urgent matter that needed to be handled expediently. I understand why you felt it had to be done and you did your job as a fellow Wikipedian, so I commend you for doing it, even though I reverted it a few seconds later; the squeaky wheel really needed grease and I felt it warranted highlighting at the time. The matter is being handled and that is all I ever wanted with respect to this situation. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was a death threat on my life, not a threat of suicide of another... — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, a lurker!

I love when you guys pop up.

Any chance I can talk you into joining the team?

We're getting ever-closer to moving a set of over 200 drafts into the article namespace. (We're trying to jump-start Wikipedia's Outline of knowledge).

It's proved to be a monumental task, but we've been hacking away at it with advanced wiki-tools and brute force (manual) editing.

But we still have a long ways to go (even though we're over half done), and we could use all the help we can get.

The Transhumanist 04:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure if that's my thing.

I'm more of a gnome: Tidy up what's already there, maybe add a fact or two that isn't already listed. There are only a couple of situations in which I've actually added significant information to an article. Generally my thing is cleaning up what's there and, of course, vandal repair. HalfShadow 17:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, you like to make lots of little changes here and there? The Transhumanist 19:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More or less, yeah. I also generally tend towards the fictional stuff. I don't think of myself as a poster, more of an editor: I make what's already there read better. Which isn't to say I can't be of help, I'm just not seeing any obvious way I could be. I'm not saying no, though. HalfShadow 22:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. That's what I thought. One major type of WikiGnome activity and page improvement is fixing redlinks. And we've got lots of redlinks. I like to call fixing redlinks "bluelinking". We need as many WikiGnomes as we can get to bluelink these pages. If you are interested, please let me know. (Please don't edit our redlinks! They're standardized. Instead, rename a misnamed page to the title in the redlink, or create a redirect leading to wherever the information is).

By the way, what method do you use to browse Wikipedia? That is, do you browse conventionally (clicking on one link at a time, waiting for the page to load, and then clicking on another link, etc.), or do you batch-browse (using Linky to load many pages into browser tabs and then using Firefox's tab controls to rapidly switch between tabs to look at the various pages)?

Just curious. :)

I look forward to your reply.

The Transhumanist 22:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I use the conventional method. Unless I'm dealing with vandalism, I feel there's no real hurry, and besides when I do tidy up, it's generally stuff I'm looking at for my own interest, so I like having my full attention on it. I'm not a multi-tasker; slow and steady is good enough for me. I'm currently using Chrome, so I think in theory I could use Linky, but I'm not that sort of editor. Besides, concentrating on multiple things just raises the possibilty of my making a mistake. My way is slower, but I feel I do a more thorough job. HalfShadow 23:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't talking about editing. I was talking about browsing (reading). The "by the way" discussion isn't about multi-tasking (I can't read two pages at the same time, can you?). It's about not waiting. Waiting is a waste of time. When you click on a link, you have to wait for the page to load (which can take several seconds per page, and that adds up quick). And during that time your attention isn't on the page, as the page isn't in front of you yet (nothing is). Switching between tabs is almost instantaneous. Page-queueing (loading pages into tabs) with Linky also greatly reduces the need for backtracking, which also saves time. Your computer should wait for you, not the other way around. ;) If you'd like to minimize your microwaits, give Linky a try. I find most people can't appreciate its power until they've actually tried it for awhile. Then they can't live without it. :) The Transhumanist 00:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I misread that. Load speeds really aren't much of an issue with me (I have a cable modem); pages usually load more or less instantaneously. There are times when Wiki 'bogs down' but when that happens it tends to be happening to everyone else, too. I may try Linky out anyway, but I'm not sure it's compatible with Chrome. HalfShadow 00:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linky is a Firefox add-on. Opera has a Linky-like feature built-in. Maybe Chrome does too. In my opinion, Linky alone makes Firefox worth switching to. The Transhumanist 01:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Autorads

YYes, that kind of vandalism seems familiar to me too, but I can't remember any specific examples right now. What's important is that he's blocked, but let me know if you do find any other similar accounts, so we can start a request for checkuser. Academic Challenger (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meeresstille und glückliche Fahrt

Please remove the Speedy deletion tag from Meeresstille und glückliche Fahrt. I left links to the original artical and to the new article respectively in the edit summary as demanded by Wikipedia:Splitting. Thank you very much. --Darev (talk) 23:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Regarding List of Robotech Characters and character articles.

Yes iam aware of that. I have started a topic so that other member can give an opinion see here :-Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Robotech--SkyWalker (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --SkyWalker (talk) 03:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Fiorenza‎

I was in the process of rolling back several vandal edits, when you reverted one of my rollbacks :-) The page has now been reverted to the original version prior to the edits by the IP and Supa jew. No harm done, we were both quick to the fix. --Nsaum75 (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Care with language

Please refrain from calling other users, even blatant vandals, "bugger[s]." As you may or may not know, a bugger in UK law is a sodomite. Many users take offence to being called sodomites. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

shame on you ... lol. Nope, don't know a thing about the issues (don't 'wanna know). I just followed a link to the sig, thought it was a little .. ahhh ... bold? That's how I came across the comment - sometimes when I get so deep into research and such, I'll run across a comment like that, which just really lightens things up. Just loved the tap dance comment ;-) .. — Ched ~ ^(yes?) 05:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That gave me a good snicker. Well done. Tony Fox (arf!) 17:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ooh, I'm gonna smack him...

That right there, wasn't his fault. The AB should have disappeared when the main one did. I'd blame it on a random glitch. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watchmen

I don't know what that story is, but unless it's intended to be a sequel to the film then it doesn't belong in the "Followed by" section. If it's just some DVD feature that will provide an animated look to a portion of the original story that they could not film for the actual movie then that's all it is, and it should be discussed in the article body. Suggesting that it is a sequel of some sort is misleading to a reader if that is not the actual intention of the film makers. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rorschach

Sorry... when was the "If other similar or related articles are removed/added, all must be" level of fairness adopted? I was under the impression that each article gets judged on it's own merits. Other articles can be used as examples of how guidelines are applied or what makes a certain level of article, but they aren't shields or triggers.

As another editor pointed out: Rorschach has a better out-of story (oos) reference material and discussion than the others. Yes, there is an over use of plot in the article, but unlike the others, the plot isn't all that's there. The others only duplicate the plot summary present in the list and the base article, once they collapse back into those, there isn't anything left.

Now, there's the option of putting Rorschach up for an RfC or and AfD to redirect. There's also the option of working on the sections for the other 5 primary characters in the list to provide oos material that needs them to be split back off (and IIRC the editor that did those merges made a similar suggestion).

- J Greb (talk) 03:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect reversions

Hi. Did you know that User:98.180.08.214 has been reverting your redirects to such articles as Eden McCain, Luna Lovegood, and Sirius Black? I don't know what the consensus is, so I though I'd just let you know. Cheers! ~SunDragon34 (talk) 07:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at Fabrictramp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]