User talk:Haley113

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shespot cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shespot cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article is now live(I was in the middle of editing when I uploaded, and did not realize I hadn't saved it yet). Problem should be resolved. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Haley113 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The She Spot

Think about moving this article to your sandbox so that it doesnt get deleted while your working on it.Gears Of War 13:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip - I plan to finish it today and moved it from my sandbox so that I could upload the image. I did put the "under construction" tag at the top, though, so I thought that would be ok for a few days. In the future will finish first then upload image last. Thanks again Haley113 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also be carful, though you put the underconstruction tag on a article doesnt mean it cant be deleted.Gears Of War 17:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Chen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Chen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Chen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay Tepper (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Haley113

User:Haley113, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Haley113 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Haley113 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jay Tepper (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The She Spot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The She Spot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The She Spot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay Tepper (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Witter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Witter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Witter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The She Spot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The She Spot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The She Spot (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]