User talk:Hakan2600000

Welcome!

Hello, Hakan2600000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1RR warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EkoGraf (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hakan2600000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi its me again. A short while ago I raquested several times for an account from Wikipedia because I was blocked. Its a long story and you (the reader) might not believe it, but this is the reason. 1-2 years ago my friend used to play on mine e-mail to play on mine Battlefield account, because he didn’t have any. I know its not smart to give someone your email but still hew was my friend. He made a month later after I gave it to him a Wikipedia accound from mine Email adres. I don’t know exactly how many but he did lots of things from what I could see. A lot of bad things. I now have read the sockpuppet page (for the first time) and see the reason why he got mine Ip blocked there. I promise to never break the rules. I only got a 1RR warning on mine page which I resolved quickly with the user EkoGraf (talk). I then reverted back 1-2 edits on 2 different pages from another user (which a reason I put on the discription of the edit) and I got accused of being a sockpuppet which indeed turns out to be true as I said above. I have nothing to do with my friend and yes I was stupid to let him use my account for more then 1 year. I promise that I never will do any kind of vandalism and I have readed now the sockpuppet article and understand the rules.

Decline reason:

As your account has been compromised, it is no longer eligible for unblock consideration, as per WP:COMPROMISED. Yamla (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hakan2600000 (talk) 16:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the reason why I responded so late is because I thaught that after being blocked that that includes my own talk page as well. Sorry for that Hakan2600000 (talk) 17:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish soldiers captured

Hey EkoGraf (talk), Mehmedsons,

I’m blocked at the moment so I try to ask/ help you from there. On the Turkish military Afrin intervention page you added by per Turkey casualties that several were captured which is not true. The Turkish president said that about a few soldiers who were kidnapped in the south east by the pkk. He made no mention about any soldier that was missing/ captured in Afrin. The Turkish military made no statement about any missing/ captured soldier either. See source: ^[1]. I hope that you can fix this. Hakan2600000 (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ [1]

[1] [1]

[1]