User talk:Hajraisabeautifulname
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Firien need help? 11:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hajra. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Cnilep (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hajra,
thank you for your message, it's good to be able to understand why you are making the changes. I don't see any problem with swapping around the order of the parts of the article. When you have found the sources you would like to cite - (whether online or offline, for example a website or a book) then just let me know and I'll be happy to 'wikify' the information into text that will not be deleted, just like I attempted to wikify what you had written previously. At the same time I will swap the order as requested.
As I mentioned on the Hajra talk page, I am also unconvinced how much information about the Hajra clan (surname) is verifiable. It looks like it certainly exists as a surname, but that the other information comes from word-of-mouth: as an encyclopedia, it is difficult to justify keeping that information. There is a chance that the other section will therefore be trimmed significantly, it just depends what I am able to find.
Please let me know when you have made some progress, I will similarly try to verify or disprove the other information on the page so that we can together make an article can be made that is accurate and informative. --Firien need help? 13:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)