User talk:Hahun
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Hello user:Hahun. I've been adding this sentence (RfC can be found here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#Proposal for the deletion of all the galleries of personalities from the articles about ethnic groups.) to your invitation on some of the talk pages about ethnic groups. Hope to be done with that tomorrow. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 02:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hope a consensus will be reached. Hahun (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hahun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why was I blocked? I have no idea who User:Iaasi is. This is ridiculous. What bad edit did I make? I can see "Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sock puppet for evidence.". But I can see no sockpuppet investigation where I am investigated! I firmly protest against this unfair decision!!! Hahun (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As a checkuser has determined there is technical evidence linking you to Iassi, I cannot unblock. Your best bet is to email the Arbitration Committee. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You're right, there is no evidence against your account posted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iaaasi/Archive. Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
@:Liz User:Liz - the last topic on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iaaasi/Archive was on October 2014, a year before I started editing. There is no discussion about me there! Hahun (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think we need to ask the blocking administrator, @Mike V:, why the block was made, as I can't see any evidence for it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- As noted here, this is a sock of Iaaasi. There was not a SPI case and it was determined through available technical evidence. Mike V • Talk 16:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Mike V: I don't suppose you could reblock, tagging it as a checkuser block and linking to the SPI - it would make it easier to process unblock requests. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- As noted here, this is a sock of Iaaasi. There was not a SPI case and it was determined through available technical evidence. Mike V • Talk 16:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think we need to ask the blocking administrator, @Mike V:, why the block was made, as I can't see any evidence for it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)