User talk:Hadrian65

This user may have left Wikipedia. Hadrian65 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 October 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Hello, Hadrian65, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Endicott Board

I reverted your edit to Endicott Board. I think that you over simplified the description. Per my reading, barbette mounts were frequently used for large guns, but the term "large" is subjective. However, to synthesize beyond data clearly provided in a reference source is considered [WP:OR|original research]]. Let's discuss; I'd be happy to learn from you. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 10:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — MrDolomite • Talk 17:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Forthancockgun.jpg

Hello, Hadrian65!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Forthancockgun.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. AMPS

Hi. I saw your addition to the submarine mines page I started and read about the AMPS with interest. I had not realized that this separate unit existed, so thanks!

There were a couple of points I thought I might edit on the AMPS page, and would like your comments. First, as the Submarine Mines page indicates, I believe any of these mines could be set, from the mine casemate, to operate either as contact mines or by observed fire. Second, I'm not sure I'd say these mines were viewed as "obsolete" during WW2. As far as I know, they remained in service through the end of the war, even though the threat they were designed to counter was recognized as continually diminishing. I also might put a link on the AMPS page back to the submarine mines page. OK?

Regards,

 Paul  Pgrig (talk) 15:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Board of Fortifications, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fort Scott, Fort Hancock and Fort Stevens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hadrian65. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:EndicottReport.tif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EndicottReport.tif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 11:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]