User talk:Haconti1

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Talk:George Sampson page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ѕandahl ♥ 20:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:George Sampson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Techman224 (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Epiglass Epoxy Resin

A tag has been placed on Epiglass Epoxy Resin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Prestonmag (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Biofouling, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Haconti1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only referencing and creating pages for reference not vandalism or even advertising

Decline reason:

Whatever your intent, if you can't see why your edits were removed and can't acknowledge that they seemed to be promoting one particular supplier and not adhering to a neutral point of view then it would not be in Wikipedia's best interest to unblock you. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Haconti1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was referencing, i was at no time spamming, i was referencing the company that made the paint which was being described, i also feel like it is unfair as the company "apple" has ipod and is referenced.. and i don't understand why the paint industry Isnt the same.

Decline reason:

There is a difference between referencing a particular product to a vendor, and advertising for a certain vendor of a product. Equally, linking to a sales page for a certain company on a page detailing a generic product is against the WP:EL and WP:Advert policies. Please see out reliable sources page, which details what is, and what aren't reliable sources. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 13:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.