User talk:Habonuwa

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 06:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you have been here for nearly three years and are still making edits with highly misleading edit summaries demonstrates a staggering level of incompetence. You are not welcome here. Your talk page history is also interesting, to say the least. Graham87 06:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habonuwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that am an amateur on Wikipedia and it wasn't intentional to be disruptive with editing, am learning and I agree to be loyal to Wikipedia and change my editing behavior skills, if there were lessons to learn how best I can contribute to Wikipedia it would be helpful than having my account blocked, am new here and your guidance is very important but if it won't be possible for any advice, I request my account to be deleted or put into vanish mode by the administration, thank you

Decline reason:

Please tell us what was disruptive about your edits, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make going forward. It is not possible to delete an account, but you may abandon and stop using your account. WP:VANISH is only an option for accounts in good standing. There is no need to do either of those things if you can articulate the issues here. 331dot (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The decision made was judgemental, I didn't have a chance to be guided as an amateur editor towards my contribution to Wikipedia by improving my editing skills, I never received guidelines for lessons on how to improve my editing, all I received is a block and that am not welcome here because of my mistakes in editing. I can never repeat the same mistakes but I have no validation from Wikipedia towards sharing my knowledge.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habonuwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason for blocking can be avoided after understanding that red ink is okay someone can create the article no need to fix itHabonuwa (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habonuwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

disruptive editing is avoidable after understanding Wikipedia terms of use and I agree to them Habonuwa (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please tell how you were disruptive and what specific steps you will take to avoid it. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia terms of use

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Habonuwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

disruptive editing by writing articles without sources and also editing red ink and I can avoid that by following wikipedia terms of useHabonuwa (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=disruptive editing by writing articles without sources and also editing red ink and I can avoid that by following wikipedia terms of use[[User:Habonuwa|Habonuwa]] ([[User talk:Habonuwa#top|talk]]) 20:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=disruptive editing by writing articles without sources and also editing red ink and I can avoid that by following wikipedia terms of use[[User:Habonuwa|Habonuwa]] ([[User talk:Habonuwa#top|talk]]) 20:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=disruptive editing by writing articles without sources and also editing red ink and I can avoid that by following wikipedia terms of use[[User:Habonuwa|Habonuwa]] ([[User talk:Habonuwa#top|talk]]) 20:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Habonuwa (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Habonuwa, I think it was unduly harsh to block you, but you're really hurting your case with these unblock requests. Writing in full, complete, punctuated sentences will help a lot. Looking at your edit history, I see that you didn't get to make very many edits before you were blocked, but that almost none of them have accurate edit summaries. I think you will need to commit to using accurate, helpful summaries with every edit in order to be unblocked. Can you do that? -- asilvering (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Habonuwa (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]