User talk:Hablador

Welcome!

Hello, Hablador, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Anka wolbert, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Corvus cornix_talk 23:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anka wolbert

The article Anka wolbert has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living persons must have reliable sources.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Corvus cornix_talk 23:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pieter Nooten. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 23:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Pieter Nooten. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 00:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Clan of Xymox. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Pieter Nooten, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Corvus cornix_talk 00:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anka Wolbert

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anka Wolbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy deletion template: I believe that a claim to notability is made and that A7 does not apply. However, the article is still an unreferenced BLP. Please see WP:BLP for our policies, and WP:RS and WP:CITE for properly adding acceptable references. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Clan_of_Xymox_.28the_article.2C_not_the_band.29_needs_your_help. Corvus cornix_talk 02:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hablador, the image you just added to Clan of Xymox was way too huge and not in the right place. There was no information on when the photo was taken, so I put "2010" since it looked like a recent image. It's in the infobox now, which is a better place--please change the date if it's not correct. You could add the names, if you like (see, for instance, the image in the infobox in U2). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And who do you think you are to tell anyone what to put where?--Hablador (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC) And on top of that, since you think you know anything at all about this band... this picture was taken in 2009!!!Hablador (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eh...that's why I asked you. Look above, where it says "please change the date if it's not correct." As for who I am--I am someone who has read the Manual of Style. I am also someone who has nothing whatsoever to do with this band. Drmies (talk) 05:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and I believe you... shame the manual didn't make you any wiser about the bandHablador (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say anything about the band. And I never cared for goth--at my high school, it wasn't the most attractive or smartest kids that listened to it. Hey, instead of insulting me, go write an article for Ronny Moorings--he seems the most notable of the band. Or should I write him up in the Clan article so you can copy it, like you did for Nooten and Wolbert? Drmies (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the obsession all about???? I'm just trying to put some up to date stuff... It is a public encyclepedia and it is supposed to be up to date and NOT stuck in 20 years ago...Hablador (talk) 06:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for File:COX 4.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:COX 4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?Drmies (talk) 06:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clan of Xymox

I've reverted your edits. The image was already in the article and yours overwhelmed the article, and we do not use our own articles as sources. See MOS:IMAGES for guidance on image use. If you disagree, please try to get consensus on the talk page before you do this again. Dougweller (talk) 06:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I've reverted you again [1]. There's no need to put that image up, the size of a billboard on the page. It's already ON the page in the infobox. Just leave it there, that's where it's supposed to go, please. Dayewalker (talk) 06:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Clan of Xymox. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 07:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Clan of Xymox, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch^™ and © 07:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 7 07:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Hablador, you really can't edit like that. If you keep reverting, you will get blocked from editing, and if necessary the Clan of Xymox page will be protected so other people (except admins) can't edit it either. It's impossible to "win" conflicts like this with your tactics. You have to convince people by discussion that your idea is the right thing to do.

Also, the picture you uploaded looks to have been taken by Achim Webel, a professional photographer from Germany. Is that you? If yes, please confirm by mailing permissions-en@wikimedia.org so they can keep track of the official permission. If that's not you, then it's a big error to label the photo as "own work" (meaning that you took the photo yourself), so you should fix the label over on Commons.

67.122.209.190 (talk) 07:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knowitallfortoday for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]