User talk:HZ73juFrt

November 2021

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Non-fungible token have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for contributing to Non-fungible token. I want to let you know, however, that your deletion of the paragraph on Curio Cards, under Digital art, will be undone. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Content removal policy before deleting information from a page. It is important to know that removal of content requires valid reasoning or clear consensus. Regarding your argument in the edit summary, please have a look at Digital art. Thanks, and keep contributing! DecentrallyConnected (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I always try to remain objective but am still learning. I will try to pay more attention in the future.

February 2022

Hello, I'm Netherzone. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of most expensive non-fungible tokens without adequately explaining why or using the article talk page to discuss your bold change. Please do not blank relevant content on articles, this is can be construed as edit warring. Rather than reverting, you should start a conversation on the article talk page per WP:BRD. Netherzone (talk) 22:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I was significantly involved in building this page, the more it amazes me that all NFTs are single editions, only with the artist PAK multi-edition are summed up so that he has the highest sales, this is factually wrong and looks to me like manipulation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HZ73juFrt (talk • contribs)

You forgot to sign your message by using 4 tilde's ~ I went ahead and signed it on your behalf. Good to meet you here and to learn of your interest in contemporary art. It's great that you have contributed to the article but that does not mean that you own it WP:OWN or can manage the content therein even if you believe that you are an "expert" in the subject. Wikipedia does not work that way, all editors are equal. It is suggested to start a discussion about your proposed change on the article talk page so other editors can chime in for consensus. The talk page is located here. If you want to learn more about how WP works, there are some tutorials available. cheers, Netherzone (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am in NFTs since 2017 and in Cryptoart since 2018, in pyhsical art since over 20 years so I know all the actors, believe me, I am here to help, but don't have the time to spend hours in discussions, if you guys think you know more about NFTs and Cryptoart then me. That is okay.

I think I know more than art, NFts and cryptoarte than you (and am not here to debate, been in btc since 2013 and art over last 30 years). The NFTs removed by you created by Pak is blatant censorship. Clock was a single NFT and purchased by AssangeDao for ~$53 million and Merge is a single work distributed across multiple tokens. Just look at the sources - welcome to the blockchain and innovative things that can be done on it. Shortshoward (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]