User talk:HTA
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to HTA. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Casper2k3 19:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day; Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang. (aeropagitica) 14:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- This is regarding your reposting of a deleted article. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer 19:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Bias Opinon
[edit]This is in reply to the message you left on my talk page. I'm sorry if you feel that Wikipedia is discriminatory in deciding what articles are deleted; but I can assure you, this is not the case. Articles are selected for deletion based upon very specific criteria, please see Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Wikipedia content is not censored. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and every topic does not warrant an encyclopedia article. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for specifics. Also, personal attacks are not welcome here. You should read WP:CIVIL. Accurizer 21:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Bias opinion on articles (Original message posted at User Talk:Casper2k3 and reply)
[edit]Administrators have been deleting articles saying it is nonsense; however, they leave other better constructed articles on similar topics. I feel you are targeting certain races particulary blacks. If I knew how to report you to the Wiki president I would. I feel I deserve an apology and want to know what you have against the African Race. I think you are very wet and stupid. I would link wet but that is nonsence.
- Thankyou for your message expressing your concerns.
- First off - I am not an administrator, I am a recent changes patroller. RC Patrollers exist to protect the wiki from harmful edits (vandalism, unsuitable pages, personal attack pages and so on).
- Second, I am not racist. I do not - and would not - have knowledge of your skin color or ethnicity.
- Third, I edited the HTA page as, in my opinion, the comments you added in this revision were unnecessary. The HTA page was subsequently vandalised multiple times, which led to the page being protected from being edited, by an administrator.
- If you want to appeal against the page being protected, please see WP:RPP.
- Please also sign your comments on all talk pages by puting four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message (more info...).
- --Casper2k3 20:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
"Learned" and "educated" mean the same; "learned" is prnounced "learn-ed", and is a bit more archaic, but still accurate. Even so, this is a plain language encyclopedia, so I think it was a good edit. - CobaltBlueTony 14:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
No Personal Attacks: User_talk:65.214.113.3
[edit]Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Drew Brink, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HondasareGOOD (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of High Tech Academy (Highland Springs, Virginia) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High Tech Academy (Highland Springs, Virginia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Tech Academy (Highland Springs, Virginia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meters (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)