User talk:HS188EP
This whole process has the most variation of validity and reliability that exists in the entire literature, if one is to call Wikipedia literature. There are wikipedia articles with as much validity and reliability as peer-reviewed articles, and there are articles with as much substance as a billboard for a local business. While most people use wikipedia to look up material to start a process of review for more legitimate authorship, to wait for a month on an article that should have had a final decision within an week is absurd. Thank you for the help on researching how Wikipedia works - it has been an experience!
The file File:Liszt in 1867.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by c:File:Liszt-1870.jpg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
