User talk:HPfan4

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Albus Dumbledore appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Note, including criticism from reliable sources is perfectly acceptable within articles, you should not however try to alter articles to fit in with one, rather bigoted, point of view. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered you on the article's talk page. --HPfan4 (talk) 07:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Your recent editing history at Albus Dumbledore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 16:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningfully

Hi there, the introduction of "meaningfully" in describing a look is interpretive, as the other editor noted. It's dubious whether or not a look needs to be included in a plot description, as it does little to explain the plot. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Barefooters

I appreciate the idea behind having such categories, but I do not see them as possibly defining, so I have nominated these for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 June 15#Category:Barefooters. BD2412 T 21:44, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk about Tia Dalma

Hi, why do you keep reverting my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anger0104 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because you're removing reliably sourced content. HPfan4 (talk) 16:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but I am trying to remove content that is both racist and sexist and is not addressed blatant discrimination. If you are so intent to keep that info in, then provide that context — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anger0104 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DISCL, the content is just the opinions of the critics on how the character is written. If you think it's "racist and sexist", your qualms should be with the movie's scriptwriter, not with the Wikipedia article. --HPfan4 (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My issue is that it is stated with no context and no reference to the bigotry in its statement, please try to contextualise the statements to give the readers all perspective or refrain from reverting further edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.213.95.160 (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional hoaxers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional hoaxers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaqen H'ghar-Tom Wlaschiha.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jaqen H'ghar-Tom Wlaschiha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NPOVN discussion

Hi,

I pinged you in the discussion, but just wanted to make sure you were aware that I started a WP:NPOVN thread about our dispute.

jps (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I replied on the article's talk page. --HPfan4 (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eccentrics and Category:Fictional eccentrics

Hello, I've deleted these categories you creataed under criterion for speedy deletion G4 as re-creations of previously deleted categories and protected them against further re-creation. The eccentrics category in particular is a potential biographies of living people nightmare. When you create a category, please check to see if it's been deleted beforehand, and do not create highly subjective categories. Graham87 16:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rubikus.HelpUA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rubikus.HelpUA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubikus.HelpUA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamlarT (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional elective mutes has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional elective mutes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional illeists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional illeists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XI

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XI on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian activists against the Russian invasion of Ukraine has been nominated for renaming

Category:Russian activists against the Russian invasion of Ukraine has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Illeists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Illeists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional illeists

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional illeists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional illeists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fictional illeists has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Council Wars (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is almost entirely original research - lacking any inline citations referencing reliable independent sources. The only sources cited relate to one book in the series.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Council Wars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HPfan4! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]