User talk:HMishkoff

So you wrote the famous Tunnels of Doom music? Count me impressed! Czolgolz 16:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets agree to disagree. I do not wish to continue any back-and-forth arguments over such insignificant issues. It is a waste of time and energy. I hope you agree.--No1Manhattanite (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem -- as soon as you stop attacking me, I'll stop defending myself. HMishkoff (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, i do not wish to continue with these back and forth communications and arguments. This is my second request. Thank You.--Nyjockboy2 (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, just stop writing to (or about) me, and I'll stop writing back. (And try not to switch usernames in the middle of a conversation, it's confusing.) HMishkoff (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dates and reference citations

Hi. In response to your comment on my talk page, you are correct that it is good practice to include the access date on a reference citation to a website, since web content can change. That principle applies when listing web citations to sources (as discussed in Wikipedia:Citing sources) but not when listing websites as external links (see Wikipedia:External links). In the first instance, the URL identifies the source of the fact(s) included in the article. In the second instance, the URL is provided as a source of additional information for the reader. The date that I edited out of the NRHS article was included in an external link, not in a source citation. --Orlady (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Paine Cottage

Thanks for your helpful edits, much appreciated. dm (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HMishkoff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HMishkoff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]