User talk:HJMG

This user may have left Wikipedia. HJMG has not edited Wikipedia since May 30, 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HJMG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

--Telsa (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hey! Thanks for finishing the Louis-Alexandre Expilly de la Poipe French translation. Looks good! Tamarkot 17:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing! And thanks for your good work keeping the translation page orderly - I should have tidied up after myself.HJMG 18:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome for the map! In fact, thank you for showing me a lovely page full of requests for maps--I know I'm going to ~~procrastinate~~ that is, contribute a bit more, I think. (Ehehe.) Tamarkot 18:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Edinburgh Seven

Couldn't just stick a welcome template on your page and leave it at that. Wow, what a fantastic job you've done on Edinburgh Seven: details, references, copyedited, the lot. It's not a well-linked article (see "What links here" when you're on that page, but I hope that changes. Looking at your other big contribution, I guess you're wandering through the "article in need of attention" lists? Hours of fun :) --Telsa (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Dauve date!

I'm just curious - what attracted you to the Dauve entry? Are you interested in left communist theory? Chinaleftcom 10:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

(25 March - removed discussion headed JSS to stop this talk page coming second in google search results for that person)

Oops, forgot to sign the comment above--HJMG 08:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Émile Appell (thank you!)

Thank you ever so much for the quick and beautiful translation. Perhaps the Harvard mention refers to a one-year visiting professor appointment, left out in the St. Andrews biography? Who knows. Well, it is now annotated, thanks to you, on the Talk:Paul Émile Appell page, so that this information is at the very least available for consideration in English. Once again, merci beaucoup! -- Mareklug ^talk 19:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for digging up the information re: who taught Morse at Harvard. I replied for continuity on my own talk page. -- Mareklug ^talk 20:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kendal Black Drop

Good work on expanding the Kendal Black Drop article I started. --Ebz 08:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ebz. Good idea for an article - I couldn't resist adding some bits.--HJMG 09:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Artists

Hi HJMG, thanks for your message and kind words. I work away on artist related articles from time to time, particularly Scottish artists, and was working on preparing William McTaggart when, somehow, I stumbled upon your Edinburgh School article. That inspired me into action for the others!! I am a big believer in providing appropriate images for articles, particularly for the visual arts, so I add them whenever I can. I've got Robin Philipson pencilled in for an article, unless you beat me to it :-) Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 17:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fleur-de-lis

Just wanted to thank you for keeping an eye on Fleur-de-lis. - Jmabel | Talk 17:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slave trade

I'm really happy to hear that the article has found a translator so fast :-) As for the title, I also was doubtful about Muslim slave trade; Islamic slave trade is probably better. I also believe that Eastern slave trade would not be a good solution for the name of the article, as it would be too euro-centric.--Aldux 17:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly to call him simply animist would be wrong; see also Songhai Empire. Something like "mainly Muslim" or "Muslim (while also holding animistic beliefs)" seems the most correct way to me. I also think it's a pity the title may be misunderstood, but I'm afraid there's little we can do. Bye! --Aldux 09:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the mess i made with the references, i'll be more careful in future. It's a good article, i'd like to help out with it more, after a run in the sandbox though. --Filosofaster 17:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for investigation (83.109.24.238)

Hi HJMG. I noticed that you added a request for investigation. That page is only for very specific cases, as described by the page's guidelines. Your alert would be better placed on Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), where it will usually be processed within minutes. Many alerts that are incorrectly placed on Requests for investigation are never dealt with, simply because they become old before an administrator gets to them. Thanks for your efforts. :) // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 08:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UK?

Yes, you are quite right, although personally I always try to avoid the dreaded "Britain" too, as it is so ambiguous, so I would only amend your suggestion with "Great Britain or Ireland" rather than "Britain or Ireland".

(PS. you do know that we have a Three Sisters too: Three Sisters (Glencoe). I must highlight that red link at the Scottish Wikipedians' notice board. I saw the photo of your Three Sisters, and immediately thought: "That's not the Three Sisters!". Just shows how much we Scots got about, merrily slapping our names all over the maps of the globe.) --Mais oui! 15:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverend John Thomson

Thanks for the note. There's quite a bit of variation on web sources about whether or not the phrase is attributable to him, and how it came about. I tend to trust material from the Gazeteer for Scotland which attributes it to him, albeit rather vaguely. If you can track down anything definitive that would be great. --Cactus.man ✍ 09:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think "often credited", whilst potentially weaselly, is a valid phrase when there are sufficient sources with variable descriptions and dispute over validity. Moving it into a trivia / anecdotes section also diminishes its significance in the article. There's probably a fair bit more information that can be added to the main body of text, so please chip in :-) --Cactus.man ✍ 10:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK!!

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Myriorama, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your efforts! Featured pic too. ++Lar: t/c 20:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Gabriel Bonnet de Mably

Not really. I'd suggest asking on his talkpage. My usual modus operandi is to check on Google Books how many books use which spelling and go with the most popular variant.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 15:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Cohen (internet)

I simply reverted where Philsome had removed an AfD tag and made a comment on the page that the proper AfD format needed to be followed. I have no opinion either to keep or to delete, merely that AfD tags should not be removed until consensus to keep or delete is reached. KC9CQJ 21:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On June 10, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Barbara Ward, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Your DYK nomination for Perth Gaol was successful

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Perth Gaol, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 02:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination for Sternotherus odoratus was successful

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Sternotherus odoratus, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 01:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool, thanks for nominating the article. -Dawson 05:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

You're welcome. :) - ulayiti (talk) 13:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sir William Lithgow, 2nd Baronet

The MoS seems quite clear to me: Section 5 of the Non Royal titles bit states:

Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith.

Since disambiguation is necessary (because there are 3 other WLs), I located the article at its present position. Locating the article at Sir William Lithgow would not be correct - it would imply he was a Knight, which he wasn't, and also section 4 of the above section of the MoS seems to advise against using simply Sir.

I am generally of the opinion that article names such as Name (profession) in disambiguation are not desirable if there is some titular disambiguation that can be used, though some other part of the MoS may take a contrary opinion. --New Progressive 10:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tollcross and references

Hi, and thanks very much for your message. I've replied directly, in my talk page. – Kieran T ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eyrecourt

The only thing I know about Eyrecourt before the Eyres arrived is that it was owned by the O'Madden family, presumably then called O'Madden Castle or something similar. I was under the impression that the O'Maddens had constructed it. I will look through my sources to see what I can find for you. I would also appreciate your help in combating abusive administrators, namely User: Zoe, the seediness of whose conduct becomes more and more apparent as I look at her records. I have seen some pretty bad administrators, but this is the worst case I have ever seen. Does Wikipedia have any type of impeachment process for administrators who overstep their bounds? She has deleted articles for not having sources when the articles are still in progress (and as such sources likely would not have been posted), and she routinely deletes scores of articles without allowing any discussion or creating Articles of Deletion pages, as is customary here. One of her allies confesses that he will delete what he doesn't like, "Wikipedia policy notwithstanding." I will provide a link to his talk page. Something must be done about this. This is tyrannical, and not in keeping with how this encyclopedia is supposed to do business.

History21 20:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)History21[reply]

Answered on History21's talk page.HJMG 11:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Hume Brown

On 31 July, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peter Hume Brown, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Many thanks for the great article! I enjoyed reading it. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 00:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cats

Many thanks. No worries. "Cumberland" / "Cumbernauld" - how did that mix-up happen in the records? --Mais oui! 16:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fleur-de-lis

Go for the bold! Minor comments: The word is used 37 times in the article and can be referred to generally as "the symbol" for brevity. #Modern usage has lower case "the" preceeding several entries that can be deleted. Many images fight for attention on the page and some can be removed. I can't find the symbol in Filippo_Lippi's Madonna in the Forest. The botanical diagram from the Dictionary of Architecture can move to a position higher on the page, as this is a primary origin of the symbol. --Dogears (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Arab slave trade" section in the Islam and Slavery article

Hi HJMG,

The "Arab slave trade" section in the Islam and Slavery article is unsourced. I realized that you are knowledgable about this issue and have access to academic sources. I would appreciate if you could make this section referenced. Thanks in advance, --Aminz 06:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aminz - and thanks for your message. Unfortunately, I'm afraid I'm not going to be much use to you. I'm not "knowledgeable" and got involved here by chance, after responding to a request to translate the 'Arab Slave Trade' article from French into English. At that time, I rearranged the French bibliography slightly, giving English editions of some books, and removing francophone external links. Since then, this book has been added to the list, and so has an English translation of Ibn Khaldun. Inline citations to "Pankhurst, Richard. The Ethiopian Borderlands: Essays in Regional History from Ancient Times to the End of the 18th Century. Asmara, Eritrea: The Red Sea, Inc., 1997" and to Mintz, S. Digital History Slavery, Facts & Myths have also been added, and the text changed a little. Sorry - but I can't think of anything I can do to help, as I don't have any of the books or articles to hand. Good luck with sorting this out! --HJMG 10:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks HJMG for response. Thanks for translating the article from French BTW. I will work the references out. Cheers, --Aminz 21:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 7 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Helen, Lady Dufferin, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

License tagging for Image:Cubby Roo's Castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cubby Roo's Castle.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks - think I have found the right tag now. --HJMG 15:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World War

Thanks for you input. I will concentrate on things, such as 'World War 11' (eleven) to become 'World War II' and so on. Hmains 03:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philanthropists

I have recently learned that a person who donates a great amount of time to the performance of work which benefits others is a philanthropist. William Ladd was that type of philanthropist, too. New International Encyclopedia states that Mary Anne Everett Green was a philanthropist. She gave away her time. In the dictionary, philanthropy is (1) "goodwill to fellowman" and (2 a) "a philanthropic act or gift" or (2 b) "an organization distributing or supported by philanthropic funds" GhostofSuperslum 05:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Naming Conventions

Hello. Yes, although he was the only holder of that title, we'd still use the nominal '1st', something which is usually written in Peerage works as '1st and last Baron...', although we don't do that here. Thanks Craigy (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thankyou for your reply to my question on the Ref Desk- I'd forgotten about INSEE! I was able to find what I needed and now I just have to write the damn thing...

Thanks again! Farosdaughter 17:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome - glad they had what you wanted. --HJMG 22:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sygun etc.

Thanks for the note. I didn't realise how much of a commercial COI there might until I saw the thousands of Google hits for Sygun and eBay. Tearlach 16:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Findlater

Thanks for the birth certificate details. I only knew secondary sources.

Gartnait 06:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clovis.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clovis.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Only One Earth.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Only One Earth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]