User talk:HAILXSATANX666
HAILXSATANX666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, my name meets wikipedia's usage guidelines. Do other users have the words "GOD", "BLESS", or religious words like "JESUS", "ALLAH", "LOKI", "LORD", "CHRIST", "allahu akbar", a roman god name, and so on in this reference[1]? This is just a common Satanic (religious) greeting. If that is disruptive I'd like to request someone to say religious words or greetings and the like[2] are not allowed in Wikipedia usernames and those ones referenced earlier nor words that imply religion be combed through and removed in a similar manner. If you can read my wiki edits, i'm obviously writing about Satanism extensively which there is nothing intrinsically wrong with. It might be "disruptive" to some however should be supported and not censored long as it's accurate. Sometimes the truth is disruptive. This seems to be targeting me because of my religious views and without and NPOV by the admin who reported me (The Anome). I've saved and PDF'ed this petition and talk page for furture reference should this account be deleted. I'd of taken HAIL SATAN but it (or too close to) was already taken so i had to put more.
Decline reason:
There's absolutely no problem here with you being writing articles about Satanism; only the account name is at issue here. As you quite correctly say, 'It might be "disruptive" to some' to use this name. That is why this account is blocked. Please see WP:USERNAME, WP:POINT and WP:GREATWRONGS. The Anome (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HAILXSATANX666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The admin took one sentence out of my argument that needed to be understood as a whole and blocked me out of context and without rebut. My defense was rather solid. The paragraph must be taken as a whole providing premise for my argument and reasonable conclusion. If my username (which is actually just along string of characters that doesn't meet a dictionary word) is ALL of those other examples in my previous reasoning disruptive and I'd like to know if all of those and similar would be removed from a Wikipedia username. I find that hard to believe. Does that mean i can go through wikipedia looking for every username with similar words and request they all be blocked? Can i use the word "SATAN" in a username at all? Why would "HAILXSATAN", "HAILXSATANX666", "HAIL SATAN" or anything similar be then be any worse? There's all sorts of words that would and could be disruptive. My argument is my username should not be all that disruptive than other users who may use a diety, or religious word in their username. I said "may" trying to simply say someone might but that doesn't mean i should be censored for their hair pin disruption meter. For example a christian these days with certain views may be "disrupted" by a username with "allah" in it but that doesn't make it okay to block that user using "ALLAH". Do other wikipedia users use religious words in their names? I suspect they do. I find all of those disruptive however aren't going on a crusade to locate them nor do I plan to. Can I request another obviously *unbiased* admin review this? I have writing to do. Again, conversation saved to PDF in case this admin or another similar admin thinks me saluting my god in a username is overly disruptive. Please be civil and address my concern and argument. In particular can i use the word "SATAN" in a username? Just because a couple people "may" find my username "disruptive" doesn't mean i should be censored or limited to using only usernames they aren't flustered by even a tad. EDIT/ADDITION: No, my username isn't disruptive or provocative. I may not be wording the above properly to defend this nor should i need to be an expert debater to simply use a commonly used religious greeting. It could be "not favorable" or liked by some but not really a basis for "disruptive". I said "might" trying to give a NPOV only; not admitting any level of excessive "disruption". Someone that is "disrupted" by it would likely be ignorant and even more likely be anti-satanic and hostile. Being against someone's religion and acting against it like blocking my account is "disruptive" and not civil. Wikipedia nor I have to consider said ignorant people are disrupted based on ignorance. In fact, maybe they should look into my edits as they're going to mostly be on subjects that will be enlightening. It makes sense that if i'm going to write a lot of articles and edits on Satanism I have a Satanic pen/username. It's reasonable and civil. The Anome may want to read Please see WP:USERNAME, WP:POINT and WP:GREATWRONGS as mentioned as i'm pretty sure they were all just violated in his response.
Decline reason:
We've already been through this silliness with your last account, User:Barfbag666. Declined, revoked, per WP:NOTHERE and WP:GREATWRONGS. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As noted in ANI, the name can be considered promotional and combined with your edit history clearly is meant to be promotional, and, again per WP:USERNAME as quoted in the ANI thread, this combination is not acceptable. I wouldn't accept a name "UBERxISxGREAT" from a user who then posts promotional UBER material in a variety of articles, either. Rklawton (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
SPI
[edit]I'm giving you a post to let you know that I've opened up an investigation here in regards to whether or not you're the same person as ILOVESATAN666 or Barfbag666. My basic theory is that you're likely the person I emailed at the Temple since your edits are very similar to the suggestions I gave them. The only thing I forgot to tell them, which is sadly very important (and I've repeatedly told people that this was my error), is that I also needed to tell them to be transparent about who you are - namely whether or not you're directly involved with the Temple itself. (IE, member, leader, etc.) Whether or not you're the exact same person as the others has been questioned at the ANI thread. This investigation should answer that and depending on what they find, it will greatly impact the discussion. I'm aware that you're blocked, but hopefully this will at least put that portion to rest one way or another. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)