User talk:H1392

September 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Evasion of block of User:WJH1992. Your username is suspiciously similar, and you are editing exactly the same articles in exactly the same way.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Rodhull andemu 11:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This type of edit is typical of User:WJH1992 - would you care to explain why you made this edit?
In this edit, your summary said "Rmv ugly no free image icon now discouraged on WP"; tell me how a user of two days knows this?
You make minor edits to infoboxes for British actors and television characters, as did User:WJH1992. Would you care to explain why? --Rodhull andemu 14:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H1392 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah, hello I am asking for my block to be looked at I AM NOT WHO YOU SAY I AM I DON'T EVEN KNOW User:WJH1992, I'm new on here and I get blocked for NO reason so please can you unblock me like I say I AM NOT User:WJH1992, I DON'T EVEN KNOW User:WJH1992 thank you -H1392 (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You look like the same user to me. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H1392 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing against my block as I am NOT who people say I am, I am just an innocent by-standard, the people on here claim I am User:WJH1992 but does anyone have proof of this??, yeah thought not so please can someone help me thanks moreover IF no one can help me then it don't matter I just wanteed help the community —H1392 (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the similarity of your edits at all, which is very telling to us. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H1392 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please just one more chance just one and if I balls up then thats my business please ---H1392 (talk) 18:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are patently a new account of a blocked user, who was blocked under an earlier account. Please log in to your first account and request an unblock there. You may not create new accounts to avoid the effects of a block for any reason. Do not make further unblock requests on this account. They will be denied, and this talk page will be protected against further disruptive edits.— Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user cannot ask for unblocking on his original account, User:WJH1992 (even assuming that's the sockmaster) because the Talk page has been protected for abuse, and I see yet another sockpuppetry case linked from there. This has gone on far too long and taken up far too much of our time, causing rangeblocks which prevent innocent editors from contributing. I myself have sent numerous emails to the abuse@ his ISP, to no apparent avail. I suggest the only way you stand any chance of being unblocked is to appeal by emailing Jimbo or the Arbitration Committee. It appears that no Admin is willing to unblock you, and to curtail this repeated disruption, I will protect this page now. --Rodhull andemu 19:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]