User talk:H/one sided conversations

This is a place for people to talk who do not wish to listen HighInBC 01:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

celebrity

that user went by it the thr wrong way, but he is right. Spending most of ones time accumulating so much wealth and power while ignoring the pleas of help from others is completely wrong. There comes a point when someone gets so powerful that its not so much a choice to help others, its an obligation as a human being. Whatever you believe in outside of our own consciusnees, there will be something to judge todays rich and famous (if they are not done so already by a revolution in our society) and they indeed are very guilty.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.91.182 (talk • contribs)

You are talking about guilt by action, not guilt by association. Also, please sign your posts. HighInBC 01:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

its still not illogical and its definitely immoral.

I can only address an arguement based on the statement given. I cannot make ones arguement for them. HighInBC 01:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Such ignorance by the rich and famous is a result of pride, greed, sloth. etc., but most of all, its a complete lack of humanity and compassion for others and using excuses to cover up and deny their guilt. As a rich western society we have a n obligaiton to help others, but this most true of all for the high echelon of wealthy people who although a small percentage, carry enough clout to solve alot of the worlds issues with the poor if theyd be willing to just give more than what is penny change to them (even if its alot more than that to us average people). 69.156.91.182 01:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that I am not needed in this conversation, please continue this in /one sided conversations, a section I have set aside for people that speak without listening. HighInBC 01:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]