User talk:Gwizard

Welcome!

Hello Gwizard, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 04:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I edited the template - so it is not as simple as I thought.

--Gwizard 01:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

occam (programming language)

Hi. I'm not sure I understand your objection to mentioning occam91/occam 3 in this article. The occam 3 proposal did exist, was written by an INMOS employee, and even though it was never implemented, some of its features did appear in occam 2.1, which was. What possible reason could there be for omitting it from this article? See the WoTUG occam page for their description of it. Letdorf 22:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The problem is that you are clearly that employee. Your self-interest is obvious. In fact, I can see that you do all your edit work from an ST Microelectronics IP address. --Gwizard 20:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Ericsson-Zenith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Ericsson-Zenith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Ericsson-Zenith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kansan (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion is a mistake but I have no time to play on WP. Since when do we delete articles at the request of the subject? --Gwizard (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]