User talk:Gustavocaride/sandbox

Hi Gustavo, Maude, and Jesika,

This is a good start; I would suggest you add a few more references, especially recent MOF discoveries. Also, perhaps you can add more detailed information about temperature and pressure swing adsorption. Finally, I'm not sure that this is best linked to the scrubber article - what about the adsorption page instead? Mswent (talk) 04:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is Yorukcan. Some thought that came to my mind reading your article:

In general it would be great to add some images since its a visual topic. Also when discussing the case study you may want to avoid saying 'they' or giving actual names at all. I thought that amine technology causes electricity prices to increase by 30% so I was confused when you said it would increase by 81%. You may want to explicitly say that large amounts of MOF are expensive.

You can explain briefly why its harder to separate CO2 when it is in low concentrations. Also I am not sure if it is correct to call CO2 from power plants "pure". Also I was wondering what these impurities are. Explaining pre/post and oxy combustion briefly or adding links may be a good idea. Otherwise good work :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorukcan (talk • contribs) 01:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yorukcan. Thank you for the peer review. I just mention "they" because there's a lot of people involved and citing their names every time can take a lot of space, but in the reference all readers can find who those people are. Also, the 81% was stated by my source information, which as released in 2010, so you may expect that this number have dropped considerably. I'll try to make it more clear.Gustavocaride (talk) 04:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]