Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anders Vahlne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, GustafVDR!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 15:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jamiebuba,
I didnt realy understand why the article was declined. Anders Vahlne was one of the most vocal debater in Swedish media during the COVID pandemic and is somewhat a houshold name in Sweden with more published debate articles in the Swedish daily newspaper "DN.se" than most other governmental politicians in Sweden. E.g. he published the most cited debated article EVER to be published in DN.se. According to your guidlines the articles should be "neutral" hence I didnt want to put in any of the refernces that would post political or bias views in the article.
Here is a sample of his work which made him a name in Sweden during the COVID pandemic.
I would say that Anders Vahlne has a higher public recognition than many of your biography articles of Swedish professors. e.g.Karolinska professors below:
Please advice me on what you would need (references, new sections, etc) in order for the article to be qualify for being published. GustafVDR (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
