User talk:Gurrr

Resident Evil: Extinction

Instead of making personal attacks on other editors, you could try and find the citations yourself. You added the information and therefore, if you don't want it reverted, cite it. I'm sure it would have taken less time to cite it than to come on my talk page and tell me to. Aside from that, I'm only trying to improve the article by removing information that could be false (one would not know, considering there is no source for what you've added). Remember that anyone can edit the encyclopedia here and I'm only trying to make sure that the added information is correct. See WP:REF which states: "Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor". -Lindsey8417 02:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't delete everything without citations, but I do delete things that could be considered speculation or false. Just because it "sucks" to look up information, doesn't mean its unnecissary - it is completely necissary. It is not only myself, but many other editors who will delete information such as that because it could be untrue. Save yourself the trouble and find the sources for your information. Adding things without sources lessens the variability of Wikipedia. -Lindsey8417 04:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]