User talk:Gungadin/Archive16
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gungadin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Watts family page
Hi Gungadin.... I wanted to get your thoughts on this page, now that it is nearing what I saw in my final vision when I began all those months ago. The "Sharon" subsection still needs expanding and I have 1 or 2 more references to include but aside from that I would like to know what you think.... if you feel anything is missing, or too much has been done in one area, not enough in another, etc.
I plan on moving onto the Chrissie Watts article.... I see that the Den Watts, Sharon Watts, and Angie Watts articles all have "b" grades, so I would like to get the Chrissie Watts article up to that level, hopefully even higher. :)
Best regards, Familiae Watts (talk) 13:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Message!
I am independent. The Project follows me or nothing! They might want to discuss stuff but I stand on my own two feet. I lead the Project or I shall keep fighting for myself!
Thank you for your co-operation,
The 12th Doctor —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Twelfth Doctor (talk • contribs) 17:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
It is kind
I think there should be more debates. I praise you for helping me but come on. Some of these administrators are to bossy and I have to say it pisses me of. They always use the consensus as an excuse. I propose to revolt against the consensus and let us debate things as Wikipedians. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Twelfth Doctor (talk • contribs) 18:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
LAID BACK!
He's the bloody enemy! I hate his guts. He bullies and conspires against me all the time. I think that he is an absolte bastard. He is pompous and he does alot because he wants to OWN the project. He doesn't have the decency to cooperate and negotiate. He makes this thing a war! He's a bloody dictator! —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Twelfth Doctor (talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- unnecessary and inaccurate.GunGagdinMoan 18:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Edward Savage
Edward Savage (footballer) is up for deletion, for not being a notable footballer. But is he a notable actor? Thought you might like to know about it if you didn't already, as we were recently talking about EastEnders child actors. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me knwo. I think there's a case to say he was a notable actor. Although, his role in EE is pretty much covered by the Steven Beale page.GunGagdinMoan 11:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
EE
hi i was just looking at page its pretty cool like you i lik to make sure all the EastEnders pages are up to date i was wonderin do u think a page should be made for Debra Dean and Trina Johnson (even though its kinda obvious that the character is on death row) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere (talk • contribs) 20:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not too clear on what you meant by the first part of the sentence, but as for Debra and Trina, I dont think they should have their own pages. Feel free to add sources to their sections in the minor lists though. That can still be extended and really those sections are no different to them having their own page.GunGagdinMoan 21:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5gwuXsgO2zNNyOOCrZocGsVNllVeQ AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- That was a sex-growl by the way, not an annoyed one :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- A sex growl! lol. I think digital spy has the full version of his with no top.GunGagdinMoan 18:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Your new page colour makes those links almost disappear ;) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
So it does, I'm in a blue mood. It's "cornflower blue", so i'm following your floral theme with the anemone.GunGagdinMoan 00:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Character ages in infobox
Hey, Gungadin. Long time, no see. A recent discussion about soap opera character ages has taken place at TAnthony's talk page, which has led to the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Age fields in fictional character infoboxes discussion about it. Care to weigh in on this there? Flyer22 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Flyer, yeah it's been a while since we chatted. I'll have a closer read of the discussion later, but on first glance, I would be opposed to the DOB and DOD dates being excluded, mainly because in UK soaps, sometimes characters bodies appear several episodes after the characters die, meaning their last appearance can be different from their broadcast date of death. DOB I suppose is less necessary, but so long as it can be sourced, I dont see what the problem is.GunGagdinMoan 14:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, Gungadin. I just wanted to let you know and get your thoughts about it. I'll see you around. Flyer22 (talk) 13:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you think, like The Banned (EastEnders) and Dickens Hill, that we should merge some of The Firm's employees into the article? Gregory Mantel, Brad Williams (EastEnders) and Jack Dalton (EastEnders) all redirect to entries in the lists of minor characters. Joanne Francis has an article with OOU stuff. Dennis Rickman and Andy Hunter were also working for The Firm but I wouldn't merge them as they were involved in other storylines. The article needs OOU info so perhaps adding characters would help. Were there any other characters involved only in The Firm-related storylines? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- No other characters that I can think of. That article shouldnt really exist anymore. I'm fairly sure that it got redirected to the main page following an AFD! That's why I have been removing links to it. I didnt realise it had been restored. But yes, good idea about merging the characters, but it'd need OOU stuff to stay and I wasnt able to find anything about it when I searched during the AFD.00:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- The result was no consensus. I didn't know you'd been deleting links to it but I wondered why it wasn't in the main template. I think it would be nice to merge to the Firm's article, and you managed to do OOU for Joanne Francis when she was up for AFD... surely you can find something? Maybe we could merge them all anyway... or maybe just leave it. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well we could merge Joanne Francis which would give some sources at least. I think we could rustle up something. Jack Dalton may also be possible too as he's recent. I say we merge the Firm characters into it.GunGagdinMoan 13:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Would you like to do it? You're so much better at dealing with older characters ;) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah,i'll have a go :) 13:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- There's no hurry though so just have a look when you feel like it :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah,i'll have a go :) 13:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Would you like to do it? You're so much better at dealing with older characters ;) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well we could merge Joanne Francis which would give some sources at least. I think we could rustle up something. Jack Dalton may also be possible too as he's recent. I say we merge the Firm characters into it.GunGagdinMoan 13:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- The result was no consensus. I didn't know you'd been deleting links to it but I wondered why it wasn't in the main template. I think it would be nice to merge to the Firm's article, and you managed to do OOU for Joanne Francis when she was up for AFD... surely you can find something? Maybe we could merge them all anyway... or maybe just leave it. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Although it's nothing to do with Wikipedia, I wanted you to see this: http://kempfolds.blogspot.com/ AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Haha! I love it.GunGagdinMoan 00:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Why?
Why do u and that other person keep rverting my edits?? The mark tom and travis show (talk) 19:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
EastEnders clips
Have you seen the EastEnders channel on youtube? They have Mr Oppa arguing with Carol! Yeah, they should never have shows his face. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- I know, they have the one where Dot meets him in 1992 too. It did ruin it somewhat. He was always like the nanny from Muppet Babies before that, a faceless enigma! :) GunGagdinMoan 20:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's a shame they can't undo those episodes. Oh my god I just watched Deano make Abi go flying. Didn't realise she went flying quite so far. I can't believe I only just discovered it. I'll be up all night now ;) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Storylines of EastEnders
Hello. Before you disappear of the face of the... Wiki... what would you like to do with the Storylines of EastEnders articles? You suggested ages ago taking them to AFD, do you still want to? I really hate those articles, they're mostly only plot summary and are rarely maintained or updated. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, let's get rid. Do you know how to AFD? GunGagdinMoan 23:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah but I can't be arsed AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh I no, these wiki processes are far too irritating. Can u just delete? GunGagdinMoan 00:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Let's redirect for now, see if anyone moans.GunGagdinMoan 00:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- The 2000s is the only one likely to be updated mainly by ips, either we can protect it if that happens, or do the AFD.GunGagdinMoan 00:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- (ec) Good idea. AFD if unredirected. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- The 2000s is the only one likely to be updated mainly by ips, either we can protect it if that happens, or do the AFD.GunGagdinMoan 00:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Let's redirect for now, see if anyone moans.GunGagdinMoan 00:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh I no, these wiki processes are far too irritating. Can u just delete? GunGagdinMoan 00:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah but I can't be arsed AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Typical!
You go on Wikibreak and this happens! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned fair-use image
Hi, File:EE Ricky Bianca.jpg is nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 09:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey, do you like what I did with the EastEnders merchandise page? I changed it to spin-offs! I think it's a good idea cos we can talk about the website and stuff like that! I sound about 12 years old! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's a good idea too. The more of these pages we can merge the better.GunGagdinMoan 19:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I didn't merge anything, I just renamed and expanded the article. But I think it needed to be done, as now it talks about TV shows and internet. Was it Trampikey who said he wanted to write about the website? Now there's a place for it. If only he was still interested. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think he did at one stage, but I dont really see how it's notable to discuss that EE has a website cos every show has one. Nothing so special about EE's one. Isnt there something about online stuff in the main article? Couldnt that go in there. I was reading through ur comments about the main EE page and agree, so much of it is crap. We need to prune it, removing the less noteworthy critique etc.GunGagdinMoan 20:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- You can always leave Trampikey a message on his talk page at Walford web wiki if you wanna ask him.GunGagdinMoan 20:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's ok. We can always do it ourselves. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- You can always leave Trampikey a message on his talk page at Walford web wiki if you wanna ask him.GunGagdinMoan 20:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think he did at one stage, but I dont really see how it's notable to discuss that EE has a website cos every show has one. Nothing so special about EE's one. Isnt there something about online stuff in the main article? Couldnt that go in there. I was reading through ur comments about the main EE page and agree, so much of it is crap. We need to prune it, removing the less noteworthy critique etc.GunGagdinMoan 20:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi
I'm just wondering if there's any reason why you reverted the image on Stacey Slater's page to an old one? It's just that she has changed her look so surely her Wikipedia image also gets updated? --5 albert square (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- It was a bad quality image, which the uploader had altered to one captured in 2004 subsequently, so I changed it back. There's nothing wrong with having a slightly outdated image if it is better quality, because they're only there to let readers know what the character looks like, not what hair style they have in any particular week. We do tend to change the images a lot on wikipedia, and i'm the biggest culprit, but it's not necessary, and an image should only be replaced if a better capture is taken imo. Otherwise we get up-to-date images that look crap because they're such poor quality.GunGagdinMoan 00:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, I wondered if it had maybe been done in error which is why I asked. If I'm on the BBC iplayer over the next few days I might see if I can get a good picture --5 albert square (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cool, I tape the omnibus, but havent watched in a while cos I have been so busy so will try and take caps myself. Some tips for taking caps: me and Anemone agreed that if possible, try to take neutral shots, so not crying etc or scowling, and make it clear and a front facial shot where they look str8 at the camera.--GunGagdinMoan 13:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, I wondered if it had maybe been done in error which is why I asked. If I'm on the BBC iplayer over the next few days I might see if I can get a good picture --5 albert square (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Steviemioss.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Steviemioss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Danny's breakdown.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny's breakdown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Dannyjakeatscarletts.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dannyjakeatscarletts.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
File:DANNY JAKE 2006.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DANNY JAKE 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Couple of items
Hey ho, Gungadin. Hope you are enjoying the Xmas holidays. :) I've just put up 3 sections on my talk page for you and AP to have a look at - just some ideas. I put it on my talk page to save me having to repeat myself and to have one area to gage your thoughts on the matter. :) Familiae Watt§ (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Cool, I will have a look, sadly I am not on xmas holidays yet! Bah humbug.GunGagdinMoan 00:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
widescreen shot
Ok, so I've done one for Chrissie Watts but I've uploaded it to the temporary Dennis Rickman article in my userspace rather than the proper article to see what you guys think first:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Familiae_Watts/workspace/Dennis
I think it looks good, personally, but will defer to you and AP (I am actually not on my normal computer so am not 100% sure if it just looks good on this display and not others!)
It was tricky - so am not suggesting we make wide-scale replacements.... also, I appreciate how difficult it can be just to get a profile shot, let alone one that can be put into a "widescreen" format.
But I do think it looks better - I don't know why... it makes the info table appear a bit more compact and.... professional?? (if that is the right word!)
Anyway, as I said if you guys still prefer the portrait style, I will defer. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Familiae Watts (talk • contribs) 10:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KEVIN WEBSTER CS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KEVIN WEBSTER CS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
EastEnders characters
Hi, I don't know if you've seen it but I noticed you haven't commented on my proposal on WT:EE#Minor characters (revisited) about changing the lists of minor characters to lists of all characters from that year. I'd like to know what you think before I make any changes. Thanks! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Gungadin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Shobu Kapoor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Deepak Verma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
EastEnders families
Hi, I just wanted to bring your attention to User:Junipers Liege/EastEnders families, which is currently a joint effort between Junipers Liege, Frickative and me, and is coming along really nicely. I think it will affect your Karim family article, so when you get a chance, would you like to comment on this discussion? Hope you're well, AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Sonia picture
I made her picture smaller but I can't tell if I made it really bad quality because my internet connection only allows me to look at pictures in bad quality 90% of the time! I'm assuming I did though since you tried to improve it. However, you got reverted because it was bigger than the one I did. You could do a clearer picture but it'll have to be smaller... anemoneprojectors talk 23:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Nah don't worry about it, your one was small enough. I deleted the old revisions. anemoneprojectors talk 23:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- (ec)The one u kept is fine. I just reduced the size of the original as the one u had reduced seemed a little blurry. The reverter came along and reverted as I uploaded the original instead of the one I had reduced; however, I had already realised my mistake and uplaoded the reduced one, so the trigger-happy reverter essentially wasted his time by reverting to ur original reduction.... confused? :)GunGagdinMoan 23:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Very. Yeah mine was probably blurry because I get low quality images and have to press ctrl+R to see them as they're meant to be, so I probably accidentally saved it low quality before I reduced it. Yours was only slightly bigger than mine so that's fine :) anemoneprojectors talk 23:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)