User talk:Gulfstream411

Welcome!

Hello, Gulfstream411, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John McKeithen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gulfstream411, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gulfstream411! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Voelker, Sr.

Hi, I found your article in the category of Unreviewed new articles and made some changes:

removed citations to genealogical or blog sites. The best, most reliable sources are published works that have a form of editorial control. Generally, blogs and genealogical web sites are considered among the most unreliable sources. See WP:Reliable sources
to focus attention the subject of the article, I put extra information about other people in notes
edited for encyclopedic tone. See WP:Encyclopedic style
added some citation needed tags where there was uncited text.

There are comments on the Talk:Frank Voelker, Sr. page about potential additional sources of information.

These types of changes should be made the articles about his son and grandson. If there's anything else I can do to help with this, or other new articles you've written about this family, let me know.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francis Xavier Ransdell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis Xavier Ransdell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Xavier Ransdell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ミラ P 21:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Voelker Sr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Voelker Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Voelker Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ミラ P 21:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]