User talk:Gujaratiworld24

June 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please let me know what is the problem with that article? --Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That problem is quite obvious to all Wikipedia editors with a bit of common sense. Also, please make sure you are logged in when you edit. Drmies (talk) 23:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gujaratiworld24: I have now gone through the article and cleaned it up. Some of the sources are poor quality, and a few sources are missing. Now that a neutral editor (that would be me) has reviewed it, I have removed the COI tag. But I have place the refimprove tag indicating that it needs more sources. Please be aware that we are not here to promote subjects, so tread carefully when editing the article and maintain neutrality. Also, if you have any connection to Yuva Unstoppable, please disclose this below and do not edit the page directly. ThanksThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am learning and I thought let's edit all NGO pages please explain to me how to remove refimprove tag now? and what is the meaning of [where?] tag you have placed. I have no connection with any of the pages I have edited.--Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuva Unstoppable began operations in 2010 in Vadodra, Gandhinagar and Surat.[1][better source needed] Within a year its operations expanded to 30 cities in India and it was launched in Rajasthan.[2][better source needed]

Here 1 and 2 both are reputed news channel times of india which is very much recognized globally what else better source should someone add?

With Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra, Yuva Unstoppable built around 800 toilets in 4 years.[where?] - here the toilets might have been made in various cities I didn't find any place mentioned in any of the news but the news is covered by many news channels how to solve this ? --Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 02:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not have time to give you editing lessons. Please look at the links in the tag, and at the help pages on Wikipedia. It basically means you need to clarify or improve the sources.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now what to do if someone adds unnecessary tags again you just edited the article and someone is again up with same old errors without reason. You have mentioned that you are experienced editor and tags can be removed again someone is doing this what should i do? --Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The tags are there for a reason. The article needs more sources. I also noticed that you have been working on this page, but on many other pages for Indian non-profits you have added the "advertising" tag (example). SO I imagine you understand how tags work. Here, for example you added the advertising tag with the comment "There are no sources provided for such a big article seems like this is only made for promotions." You seem to understand the tags perfectly. Do you really have no connection to any of the non-profit articles you edited? It is a little hard to believe based on your edits. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gujaratiworld24. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there this is an appeal to unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gujaratiworld24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very new to Wikipedia and me and my friends were using same computer in multiple intervals for editing Wikipedia content we didn't know using multiple accounts will block us please help us to revoke all accounts either delete other two and give us to the access of one account whatever you feel better. Also, help us the right way if someone wants to use multiple accounts from the same computer if there is any? Thanks for the time I really want to help community please do whatever is best. Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 22:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not buying it. I would expect you and your friends to have edited different subjects. But that you all focused on the same subject and had similar replies? Doubtful. Even if it wasn't direct sockpuppetry, that is still meatpuppetry, which also isn't chill. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Gujaratiworld24 (talk) 22:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gujaratiworld24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

CptViraj (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]