User talk:EvieGHJ

Monteregian Hills

The Monteregian Hills might not be volcanic, but they are the oldest remnants of a hotspot track. The mountains are probably the eroded remnants of the volcanoes magma chambers. Black Tusk 02:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm trying to tell you. The mountains are probably old magma chambers that solidified under the surface and became exposed after millions of years of erosion. Magma chambers are a large underground pool of molten rock lying under the surface of the earth's crust. The molten rock in such a chamber is under great pressure, and given enough time and pressure can gradually fracture the rock around it creating outlets for the magma. If it finds a way to the surface, then the result will be a volcanic eruption; consequently many volcanoes are situated over magma chambers. The volcanoes barely exist now, and the magma chambers is all what's left of them. Black Tusk 12:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they were formed by the New England hotspot. Black Tusk 13:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to brainwash you, I'm just saying they were formed by the upwelling of magma of the New England hotspot about 150 million years ago. That's probably why they call them the reoded remnants of volcanoes on this site here. Also, hotspots always make volcanoes, which is why I believe they are part of ancient volcanoes. But even magma chambers are still part of a volcanoes. I have added the volcanoes and volcanics in Ontario, New Brunswick, Northwest Territories and Nunavut to the List of volcanoes in Canada. Black Tusk 13:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Tremblant

Hi Guillaume, I don't know Mont Tremblant very well ether. I just found that source while I was searching for more volcanoes. The source also talks about another possible volcano called "Lake on the Mountain" in Prince Edward Country, Ontario. There's a volcanic complex called Lac des Vents volcanic complex which is located in Quebec somewhere. Black Tusk 23:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guillaume, have you ever herd of the Noranda Caldera, Misema Caldera and the New Senator Caldera? They appear to be ancient volcanic craters and are part of a group called the Blank River Megacaldera Complex. Black Tusk 02:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But have you herd of the three named calderas above? They are real volcanoes and are not related with the blogspot address source. Black Tusk 03:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beloeil

Well done! I have re-assessed it as B-class but I think it should be submitted for WP:GA evaluation. It also qualifies for a WP:DYK. I tried to look for a good hook but I couldn't find one beyond the meaning "nice view" which is apparently not universally agreed. Could you see if you could think of a good hook for it? Cheers! DoubleBlue (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've added it to T:TDYK. You may want to watchlist that page and answer any question that might arise about it. Good luck! DoubleBlue (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Beloeil, Quebec

On 18 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beloeil, Quebec, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 11:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

Hello, Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of Quebec

I noticed you are a participant of the WikiProject Quebec.

The Outline of Quebec was created a few days ago and is under vigorous development. It fills a gap in Wikipedia's set of outlines. It is the 3rd outline to date about a Canadian province/territory.

Wikipedia Contents
- Outlines
  - Outline of geography
    - Outline of North America
      - Outline of Canada
        Outline of Alberta
        
        Outline of British Columbia
        
        Outline of Manitoba
        
        Outline of New Brunswick
        
        Outline of Newfoundland and Labrador
        
        Outline of Nova Scotia
        
        Outline of Ontario
        
        Outline of Quebec
        
        Outline of Prince Edward Island
        
        Outline of Saskatchewan
        
        Outline of the Northwest Territories
        
        Outline of Nunavut
        
        Outline of Yukon

Outlines form one of the subsystems of Wikipedia's contents navigation system. For more information on outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines and Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines.

The goals for the Outline of Quebec is to complete it to as high a standard of quality as possible, and to make it even better than the Outline of Saskatchewan and the Outline of British Columbia.

Once the Outline of Quebec is completed, it will provide an important example to others creating outlines for the remaining provinces and territories of Canada.

Please take a look at the outline to see if you can notice (and fill in) any missing topics. Pictures would also be nice (the rarer and the more interesting, the better).

Thank you.

Sincerely, The Transhumanist 10:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EvieGHJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]